Tax Considerations for Canadian Snowbirds

Canada is known for its long and frigid winters. Many Canadians, often referred to as snowbirds travel south to the USA to escape the freezing Canadian temperatures, taking extended vacations to enjoy the year-round warmth that parts of the United States have to offer. These so-called snowbirds should carefully plan their stays in the USA, however, since a stay exceeding a specific number of days might have unintended Canadian and US income tax consequences.
 
Canadian income tax consequences for snowbirds

Snowbirds should continue to file their Canadian tax return, as usual, reporting any worldwide income earned in the year on their T1 income tax and benefit return, whether received from inside or outside of Canada. Similarly, they should claim all the applicable deductions and credits and pay the federal and provincial or territorial taxes based on their residential ties. This generally means that any income earned by the snowbirds from the USA should be reported in their T1 return. However, to avoid double taxation, they will be able to claim a credit for the amount of any US tax paid by them, thereby reducing their Canadian tax liabilities.

US income tax consequences for snowbirds

On spending a significant amount of time in the USA, snowbirds might not realize that they may be subject to US income tax obligations by becoming, in effect, US residents as per the US tax residency rules. For US tax purposes, the residential status of a snowbird is determined under either of the US domestic tax rules for residency below. If they meet either of these tests, they will be considered a US resident and will need to comply with US income tax laws.

  1. Physically present in the USA in the current calendar year for more than 183 days
  2. Substantial presence test (SPT)

Snowbirds who are in the USA for less than 183 days in the current year can still be treated as US residents for tax purposes if they meet the SPT.

The SPT would be met if they are physically present in the USA for at least:

  • 31 days during the current year; and
  • A total of 183 days during the three-year period that includes the current and the immediately preceding two years, counting:
    • All the days they were present in the USA in the current year, and
    • One-third of the days they were present in the USA in the first year before the current year, and
    • One-sixth of the days they were present in the USA in the second year before the current year.

It is worth noting that for the SPT, a day generally includes any part of the day spent in the USA unless the individual is in transit through the USA. Furthermore, the purpose of the stay in the USA does not affect the SPT.

There are certain exceptions from the tests above that exempt snowbirds from being treated as US residents for tax purposes. These are discussed below.

1.    Canada–US income tax treaty “tie-breaker” provision – greater than 183 days

The tie-breaker rule in the income tax treaty between Canada and the USA  allows a taxpayer treated as a tax resident of both the USA and Canada under their domestic tax rules to only be treated as a resident of the country to which they have stronger ties to. Essentially, this rule will allow the taxpayer to remain a resident of one country as opposed to two. 

To be exempt under the treaty, snowbirds must demonstrate that they have stronger ties with Canada than the USA, including a permanent home, social/economic ties, habitual abode, and citizenship. In addition, they must file Form 1040NR along with a fully completed Form 8833 (treaty-based return position disclosure) explaining why they should be considered a resident of Canada and not a resident of the USA. The filing due date of both the forms—Form 1040NR and Form 8833—is June 15 of each year.

2.    Closer connection exception—SPT

Even after meeting the requirements of the SPT in a given year, snowbirds may still be able to avoid being considered US residents using the closer connection exception. Under this exception, snowbirds need to demonstrate:

  • A “closer connection” to Canada, and 
  • That they were in the USA for less than 183 days in the year.

To claim this exception, snowbirds must first establish that they maintained more significant residential ties with Canada than with the USA. A closer connection generally exists if their social and economic ties (such as the location of a permanent home; family connections; personal belongings; business and banking ties; and social, political, cultural, or religious affiliations, etc.) remain closer to Canada. Secondly, they have to stay in the USA for less than 183 days during the year for which the exception is claimed. On satisfying both these conditions, snowbirds can fall under the closer connection exception.

In addition, they must file a US Form 8840 (closer connection exception statement for aliens) for each year for which the SPT is met, and the closer connection exception is claimed. Similar to Forms 1040NR and 8833, the filing deadline for Form 8840 is June 15 of the year following the end of the relevant tax year unless the filing date falls on a weekend or a holiday. Filing the form will allow them to maintain their tax status as a non-resident of the USA under US tax law.

Snowbirds owning US real property

Snowbirds owning US real estate property might be liable for US income tax regardless of whether they are treated as a US resident for tax purposes. While owning and using US real estate property only for personal purposes might require them to report the property on their T1 return, they do not have any US annual filing obligations with regard to that property. However, renting the US property for more than 15 days during the year or the eventual sale of the property may trigger US tax and filing obligations. 

Snowbirds renting out their homes in the USA for more than 15 days during the year and earning rental income from investment properties are usually subject to a 30%  US non-resident withholding rate which satisfies their US tax requirements. However, snowbirds can make an election to be taxed on net rental income (after taking into consideration certain expenses related to the rental income) at graduated tax rates applicable to the individual which can be more beneficial and reduce the tax liability. However, to elect to file on a net rental basis, the taxpayer will need to complete Form W-8ECI to avoid the 30% withholding tax. The form applies to a foreign national who is the beneficial owner of the US source income that is (or is deemed to be) effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the USA.

If the election is filed, the snowbird will be required to file a US tax return (Form 1040NR) to report the net rental income.

The taxpayer will require a US tax identification number to make this election and to file the US return.

Similarly, the sale of a US property would be subject to a 15% US non-resident withholding rate on the gross sale price at the closing date. However, the snowbird can file a waiver to have this withholding based on the net capital gain (if any) and/or claim a possible exemption. The snowbird would then report the net capital gain realized from the sale on a US tax return and claim any withholding as an instalment toward their final liability.

Since US net rental income or US net capital gain would also have to be reported on their Canadian tax return, the snowbird can claim any US tax paid on their US return as a credit on their Canadian return to reduce their Canadian tax and avoid double taxation.

Key takeaways

While an extended vacation to warmer locales may be an excellent way to beat the Canadian winter blues, travellers must keep abreast of any US tax reporting obligations they may be subject to. Keeping track of the number of days spent in the USA is an important first step for all snowbirds. Staying under the 183-day threshold may help snowbirds avoid any unintended tax consequences.




This article was written by Frank Casciaro, Chetna Thapar, Danielle Wallace and originally appeared on 2022-07-28 RSM Canada, and is available online at https://rsmcanada.com/insights/services/business-tax-insights/tax-considerations-for-canadian-snowbirds.html.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.

DJB is a proud member of RSM Canada Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms across North America. RSM Canada Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM Canada LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the Canadian member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM Canada Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how DJB can assist you, please contact us.

Association and HST

In the tax world, association can have a significant impact on your income taxes, but it can also impact your GST/HST as well.   When it comes to having to register for GST/HST, the small supplier threshold of $30,000 (or $50,000 for public service bodies) applies to a company and its associates.  Association is defined in section 127 of the Excise Tax Act (ETA) and subsections 256 (1) to (6) of the Income Tax Act (ITA).  The rules of association for ITA purposes can be found at:  http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-3.3/section-256.html

When it comes to association and GST/HST, a common error is not factoring in all of the taxable sales of all associated parties when looking at the small supplier test.  Unlike the ITA definition of association, which applies to corporations only, the ETA extends this definition to apply to other persons (such as individuals).  It is common for an individual who controls a corporation to charge management fees or commercial rent to their corporation.  Assuming the corporation they control is not a small supplier, due to the association rules, these fees would be taxable for GST/HST.  Having the individual registered and charging for these services is often overlooked on the incorrect assumption they are not taxable if under $30,000 of taxable supplies.  Please note the appropriateness and income tax consequences of such management fees are beyond the scope of this article.

It should also be noted that, as a trust and a partnership is a person for GST/HST purposes, they should also be factored into association with any corporations with common ownership.

If you have a corporate group with transactions amongst all of the entities and shareholders, it would be prudent to have a GST/HST review done to ensure that all taxes are being charged appropriately.

CEBA REPAYMENT DEADLINE EXTENDED: Some Issues

On September 14, 2023, the Department of Finance provided details on extending the deadline for Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) repayments, including the following key elements:

  • the deadline to qualify for partial loan forgiveness (by paying the non-forgivable portion) has been extended from December 31, 2023, to January 18, 2024;
  • if a refinancing application is made with the financial institution that provided the CEBA loan by January 18, 2024, the deadline to qualify for partial loan forgiveness will be extended to March 28, 2024;
  • as of January 19, 2024, outstanding loans will convert to three-year term loans subject to a 5% annual interest rate regardless of whether refinancing is sought; and
  • the previous final repayment deadline of December 31, 2025, has been extended to December 31, 2026.

Financial institutions will contact CEBA loan holders directly regarding their loans. The above changes also apply to CEBA-equivalent lending through the Regional Relief and Recovery Fund.

ACTION ITEM: Ensure you fully understand the deadlines to avoid missing the partial loan forgiveness.

PAYING RENT TO NON-RESIDENTS: Withholdings
Required

In a March 30, 2023, Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayer was assessed for failing to withhold taxes on rent paid on Canadian real estate to a non-resident. Penalties and interest were also assessed.

The information known to the taxpayer was limited to an Italian telephone number on the lease document (with a Canadian number), the landlord’s email address ending with “.it” rather than “.ca” or “.com” and some Italian writing at the bottom of an email. The taxpayer argued that he did not know that the landlord was a non-resident, and that a due diligence defence should apply.

Taxpayer loses

The Court first noted that a non-resident is subject to a 25% flat tax on gross rent received on Canadian property. The Canadian resident paying the rent is required to withhold and remit this tax and is liable for it if this is not done. Penalties and interest on this amount also apply.

The Court then noted that the withholding requirement exists regardless of whether or not the taxpayer knows that the landlord is non-resident. Further, there is no due diligence defence in respect of the tax withholding. As such, the taxpayer was liable for the tax not withheld.

The Court stated that a due diligence defence could apply to penalties and interest. However, the taxpayer provided no evidence of any efforts to confirm the landlord’s residency. The absence of any reason to question the landlord’s residency was insufficient – due diligence requires taking positive steps to ensure compliance.

ACTION: Ensure to take proactive steps to understand a landlord’s residency status. Renters can be liable for unremitted withholdings even if they do not know the landlord’s residency status.

GIFTS DIRECTED TO OTHER DONEES: Loss of
Charitable Status

In some situations, a registered charity may be asked to receive donations on behalf of another organization or cause. While this may seem like a good way to generate funds and reward donors with charitable contribution receipts, it can have serious implications for the charity.

A February 1, 2023, Technical Interpretation considered a charity that would collect funds, issue receipts, and then disburse the funds to a qualified donee (a municipality). The municipality would then direct the funds to a non-qualified donee. The charity’s intention was to assist a non-qualified donee (in this case, a non-profit organization) in a fundraising campaign by collecting funds and issuing receipts.

A charity may have its status revoked if the charity:

  • carries on a business that is not a related business of that charity;
  • fails to expend amounts in any taxation year on charitable activities carried on by the charity and by way of qualifying disbursements, the total of which is at least equal to the charity’s disbursement quota for that year; or
  • makes a disbursement, other than
    • one made in the course of charitable activities carried on by it, or
    • a qualifying disbursement.

If the charity’s disbursement to the municipality was not a qualifying disbursement, the charity could have its status revoked.

A qualifying disbursement includes a gift to a qualified donee. A qualified donee includes a municipality in Canada that is registered by the Minister.

It is a question of fact as to whether the transfer to the qualified donee constituted a gift received, and therefore a qualifying disbursement. CRA’s general view is that donations can be received and receipted by a qualified donee (such as the municipality), provided that the qualified donee retains discretion regarding how the donated funds will be spent. If a qualified donee is merely acting as a conduit by collecting funds from donors, including a charity, on behalf of an organization that is legally or otherwise entitled to the funds so donated, the qualified donee is not in receipt of a gift. In this case, the gift from the charity would not be a qualifying disbursement.

A charity may also have its status revoked if it accepts a gift, the granting of which was conditional on the charity making a gift to another person, club, society, association, or organization other than a qualified donee.

ACTION: Caution and professional guidance should be sought should a charity consider accepting donations on behalf of another organization.

Tax Planning: 2023 Year-end Considerations for Businesses and Individuals

RSM Canada’s 2023 year-end tax guide summarizes the key federal, provincial, and territorial tax updates that may create risk or opportunity for middle-market taxpayers in 2024 and beyond.

Tax trends and topics discussed as the Canadian economy moves into 2024 include:

  • Revisions to the general anti-avoidance rule
  • Mandatory disclosure rules
  • Financial institutions dividend
  • Tax on repurchase of equity

As year-end approaches, companies and individuals alike must carefully consider tax-planning opportunities in light of economic uncertainty and evolving tax legislation and regulations. Learn more in our year-end planner.

 

 

Canadian tax integration on private company Income

Tax integration is achieved when a particular stream of income is subject to the same or similar total tax rate once it reaches the individual taxpayer level. These tables provide an illustration of how the Canadian income tax integration system works.

CRYPTOCURRENCY EXCHANGE CESSATION: Recordkeeping

A June 7, 2023, CryptoTaxLawyer.com article (Binance Bids Canada Bye-Bye! Canadian Tax Implications for Cryptocurrency Investors and Traders) reminded Canadians about the importance of maintaining an offline record of transactions as exchanges, such as Binance, shut down in Canada. On May 12, 2023, Binance announced that Canadian users will be required to close any open positions by September 30, 2023.

Once the exchange is closed to Canadians, there is the possibility that access to records will disappear. Such records are necessary to support tax positions and filings. The article also noted that records may need to be maintained well beyond six years, as they can support the determination of tax that may occur much farther into the future. For example, if a cryptocurrency was purchased in 2015, but is sold in 2025, records must be maintained to support the cost of the cryptocurrency sold for reporting purposes in 2025.

ACTION ITEM: Ensure records of transactions are retained offline in the event that they are no longer available online in the future.

DISABILITY TAX CREDIT (DTC): Electronic
Applications

The DTC is a non-refundable tax credit that provides tax relief for individuals (or those that support those individuals) who have a severe and prolonged impairment in physical or mental functions. To access the DTC, eligible individuals must apply for it by completing Form T2201, Disability Tax Certificate. Recently, CRA updated their services so that this application can be completed and submitted entirely electronically.

The patient can complete the non-medical portion (Part A) of Form T2201 online in CRA’s My Account with data prepopulated from CRA’s files. Doing so will generate a reference number that can be provided to the medical practitioner for entry when they complete the medical certification (Part B) within the existing digital application. The information is automatically submitted to CRA on completion of the medical certification (Part B), provided the medical practitioner has entered the reference number.

The reference number will remain on My Account until the medical certification (Part B) is completed. Representatives cannot currently complete the non-medical portion (Part A) through their Represent a Client account.

To use this new option, the patient (person applying for the DTC) must register for CRA’s My Account.

Alternatively, the non-medical portion (Part A) can be completed over the phone, either by calling the personal tax general enquiries line (1.800.959.8281) or through a new automated voice system (1.800.463.4421). The automated voice system indicates that it is intended to be used only by the disabled individual.

ACTION ITEM: To speed up and simplify the process for applying for the disability tax credit, consider using the electronic method.

WITHDRAWING FROM FAMILY RESPs: Flexible Planning Possibilities

A July 21, 2021, Money Sense article (My three kids chose different educational paths. How do I withdraw RESP funds in a way that’s fair to them and avoids unnecessary taxes?, Allan Norman) considered some possibilities and strategies to discuss when withdrawing funds from a single RESP when children have different financial needs for their education.

Some of the key points included the following:

  • There is likely a minimum educational assistance payment (EAP) withdrawal that should be taken, even by the child that needs it least.
  • The EAP includes government grants (up to $7,200) and accumulated investment earnings on both the grants and taxpayer contributions.
  • The grants can be shared, but only up to $7,200 can be received per child, with unused amounts required to be returned to the government.
  • Only $8,000 ($5,000 in previous years) in EAPs can be withdrawn in the first 13 weeks of consecutive enrollment.
  • The withdrawal amount is not restricted by school costs. • The children are taxed on EAP withdrawals.
  • It is generally best to start withdrawing the EAP amounts as early in the child’s enrollment as possible, when the child’s taxable income is lowest. If the child is expected to experience lower income in later years, there is flexibility to withdraw EAP amounts in those later years instead.
  • The level of EAP withdrawn for each child can be adjusted. As individuals are taxed on the EAP withdrawals, planning should consider the children’s other expected income (e.g. targeting less EAPs for years in which they will be working, perhaps due to co-op programs or graduation). Consider having the EAP completely withdrawn before the year of the last spring semester as the child will likely have a higher income as they start to work later in the year.
  • To the extent that investment earnings remain after all EAP withdrawals for the children are complete, the excess can be received by the subscriber. However, these amounts are not only taxable, but are subject to an additional 20% tax. Alternatively, up to $50,000 in withdrawals can also be transferred to the RESP subscriber’s RRSP (if sufficient RRSP contribution room is available), thus eliminating the additional 20% tax. An immediate decision is not necessary as the funds can be retained in the RESP until the 36th year after it was opened.

ACTION ITEM: The type, timing, and amount of RESP withdrawals can significantly impact overall levels of taxation. Where an RESP is held for multiple children, greater flexibility exists. Consult a specialist to determine what should be withdrawn, at what time, and by whom.