October 22nd, 2024
Tax Planning: 2024 Year-end Considerations for Businesses and Individuals
This tax planning guide for 2024 and beyond reflects considerations that may create risk or opportunity for Canadian businesses and individuals.
Posted on November 19th, 2024 in Cross-border Tax, Domestic Tax
The US Trade Representative has initiated consultations with Canada over the Digital Services Tax Act (DSTA) under the CUSMA trade agreement. The DSTA, effective from June 28, 2024, retroactively applies to revenues from Jan. 1, 2022, and imposes a 3% tax on digital services revenue from large corporations. The US claims the DSTA discriminates against American companies by favoring Canadian firms, citing revenue thresholds that disproportionately impact US digital service providers. The consultations aim to address these concerns and seek a resolution.
The US Trade Representative has requested consultations with Canada regarding the Digital Services Tax Act (DSTA) under the Canada-United States-Mexico (CUSMA) trade agreement. These consultations could result in amendments or a potential suspension of the legislation.
The DSTA is intended as an interim measure as the OECD works towards a multilateral solution to tax challenges arising from the digitalization of the economy. The Act came into force on June 28, 2024, but applies retroactively to revenues earned on or after Jan. 1, 2022.
The DSTA imposes a 3% tax on Canadian digital services revenue. In general, digital services revenue is comprised of revenue from the following sources:
The DSTA applies to large corporations, both foreign and Canadian, that satisfies two revenue thresholds. If a taxpayer is a member of a consolidated group, these thresholds would be calculated on a group basis.
The CUSMA requires member states to give suppliers and investors from the other member states no less favourable treatment in like circumstances than domestic suppliers and investors. The US Trade Representative alleges the DSTA targets US companies and discriminates against US companies in favour of Canadian companies.
Though the consultation request does not give the US Trade Representative’s reasoning for this determination, the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) argues the DSTA revenue thresholds create a discriminatory effect. The CCIA, while also citing a 2019 report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), argues that the high minimum revenue thresholds of the DSTA would capture many US digital services providers while excluding most Canadian competitors.
This is not the first trade dispute the US has initiated regarding a digital services tax. In 2019, France signed into law a 3% tax on revenues from digital services provided in France. The legislation had similar revenue thresholds as the DSTA. Among other support for their position, the US found the revenue thresholds excluded many non-US based companies while capturing US-based company groups. The US announced retaliatory tariffs against French products, but later suspended application of these tariffs. This was first due to France delaying imposition of the digital tax, and later, to coordinate a US response to similar legislation being introduced in other countries.
Through the CUSMA consultation, the US and Canada will attempt to find a mutually satisfactory resolution. This could result in amendments to, or even the suspension of, the DSTA. Should the US and Canada be unable to reach a resolution through consultation, the US can request conveying of a panel. The panel will determine whether the DSTA is inconsistent with Canada’s CUSMA obligations. If the panel finds in favour of the US, the countries will again attempt to reach a satisfactory resolution. Failing a resolution, the US will be permitted to suspend providing CUSMA benefits (such as non-application of tariffs and no favourable treatment of domestic suppliers) to equivalent effect as the DSTA’s infringement. The complaining party would be required to prioritize suspending benefits in the same sector first, if practicable.
This article originally appeared on 2024-10-07 and is available online at https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2024/us-disputes-digital-services-tax-act.html.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.
Drop us a line, we look forward to hearing from you.