
March 12th, 2025
U.S. Tariffs and Canada's Response: Uncertainty Complications Tariff Mitigation
As the U.S.-Canada trade standoff continues, Canadian business should explore strategies to mitigate tariff risk—stay informed here.
Posted on March 24th, 2025 in Domestic Tax
A September 6, 2024, Tax Court of Canada case reviewed whether a taxpayer’s employment by a corporation owned by her brother was insurable. The taxpayer performed various office duties for the corporation.
As the taxpayer was related to the corporation, she was non-arm’s length to the employer. A nonarm’s length employee is engaged in insurable employment if it is reasonable to conclude that they would have entered into a substantially similar employment contract with an arm’s length person. Some aspects commonly relevant to such determinations are remuneration paid, duration of work performed, nature and importance of work and, terms and conditions of employment.
The Court stated that the taxpayer’s evidence was not credible and concluded that her employment was discretionary (that is not substantially similar to a contract with an arm’s length person) and not insurable, supported by the following facts:
The Court concluded that similar terms would not have been available to an arm’s length employee, so the employment was not insurable.
As the earnings were not insurable, the employee and employer would not be responsible for EI premiums; however, the employee would not be eligible to receive EI benefits (such as sickness benefits, caregiving benefits, maternity or parental benefits, or regular benefits).
If an employee is a relative of the business owner, confirm whether their income is insurable or not, as this affects EI premiums and benefit eligibility.
Article originally published in: Tax Tips & Traps 2025 First Quarter – Issue 149.
Drop us a line, we look forward to hearing from you.