Consequences of Emigration of a Canadian Taxpayer

In a more globalized world, and especially after the COVID-19 pandemic brought about a seismic shift in our workplaces and the adoption of remote work, emigration has become a more popular option for many taxpayers in the past few years. Emigration also represents the “final departure from Canada” of a taxpayer, and potentially the final opportunity for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to tax a taxpayer, which can therefore mean large tax liabilities. The purpose of this article is to explore some of the more common consequences of emigration of a Canadian taxpayer.

Determination of Residency

Any discussion of emigration pivots around the concept of residency in Canada. In Canada, the Income Tax Act (ITA) taxes Canadian residents on their worldwide income, and non-residents on their Canadian-sourced income.

Per CRA policies and technical bulletins, the most important determinants of residency are significant residential ties, or what are colloquially referred to as the “house and spouse” ties. These ties include whether you keep a dwelling place in Canada available for occupation by you, and whether your spouse or common-law partner, or other dependents, continue to be in Canada (or in a separate country).

After the significant residential ties are assessed, secondary residential ties are then assessed – these include personal property such as cars, furniture, and clothing, any economic ties (like a job or investment accounts), or insurance coverage in Canada.

It should be noted from the above that citizenship does not equal residency – a taxpayer can be a citizen of Canada but not a resident of Canada for tax purposes.

If a taxpayer leaves Canada, and they are determined to have “severed ties” with Canada, they are determined to have ceased residency on that date, i.e. emigrated from Canada.

Consequences of Ceasing Residency

If a taxpayer ceases residency in the year, they will be deemed to have disposed of certain types of capital property, the gain on which will trigger “departure tax”. Under the ITA, any securities, cryptocurrencies, or other investments held will be deemed to be disposed of at their fair market value, , potentially creating a large tax liability.. Notably, Canadian real estate is excluded from this rule.

If the taxpayer holds an RRSP, TFSA, or RRIF, these accounts will be excluded from the deemed disposition. Any withdrawals are likely to be taxed as passive income and subject to the withholding tax requirements discussed below. However, it is important to note that the other country in which the taxpayer is now resident may not recognize the RRSP or TFSA as a tax deferring vehicle, and thus tax any income earned in the plan.

Non-residents earning income in Canada

Employment or self-employment income earned in Canada as a non-resident will be subject to Part 1 tax in Canada, and a regular T1 income tax return is required to be filed.

If passive income, such as dividends, interest, or royalties, is received by a non-resident, such income will be subject to a 25% withholding tax that will be withheld and remitted to the CRA at source.  The withholding rate could be lower than 25% for residents from certain countries having tax treaties with Canada.

RRSP, RRIF, OAS, and other pension payments are also subject to a 25% withholding tax. However, an election is available to a non-resident to file a tax return with the CRA and report the income as if they were a Canadian resident, claiming certain tax credits, and enjoying lower tax brackets.

Income from a rental property is usually subject to the 25% withholding tax as well. However, an election is available for a non-resident to file a tax return with the CRA and report the income as if they were a Canadian resident, claiming rental expenses and certain tax credits, and enjoying lower tax brackets.

Note that the election to file a return does not eliminate the requirement of withholding tax at source.

If a non-resident owns a piece of Canadian real estate, or other “taxable Canadian property”, prior to or upon disposition, 25% of the net gain must be remitted to the government and a Request for a Clearance Certificate, T2062, must be filed with the CRA. Tax returns are available to be filed to receive a partial refund of this.  Of note, the government has introduced legislation to increase this withholding tax to 35% effective January 1, 2025.

Other tax considerations

There are certain provisions of the ITA that only apply to Canadian residents.  Three notable instances of this are:

  1. Capital Gains Exemption with regards to a share sale, which requires that the shares in question be held by a Canadian resident throughout the year.
  2. The definition of a Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation states that a corporation must not be controlled by a non-resident.
  3. The emigration of a trustee/beneficiary and their subsequent non-resident status has an impact on the taxation of a Trust.

Absent proper planning, running afoul of these rules can yield a significant unplanned tax liability.

Finally, as a non-resident, a taxpayer may still have social, employment, or tourism-related desires to return to Canada. Under the ITA, a non-resident who is temporarily staying (“sojourning”) in Canada for 183 days or more in a calendar year will be considered a deemed resident of Canada for the entire year. As discussed above, a resident of Canada will be taxed on their worldwide income, which can yield a significant tax liability.

Conclusion

Determining residency can be a complex endeavour, and dealing with the consequences of a change in residency can be overwhelming. Our experienced advisors at DJB are well versed in international and domestic tax and can gladly assist you with the development of an exit plan, advise on the consequences of moving, or can help advise you on any other issues that can arise with regards to emigration.

Motor Vehicle Allowances: Carpooling

Reasonable motor vehicle allowances received by employees in the course of employment duties are non-taxable. An allowance is not reasonable (and therefore taxable) if any of the following are met:

  • the allowance is not based solely on the number of kilometres driven for employment purposes;
  • the employee is reimbursed in whole or part for expenses in respect of that use; or
  • the per-km amount is not reasonable.

A November 23, 2023, French Technical Interpretation considered the tax implications of an employer increasing the motor vehicle allowance paid to its employees by an additional per kilometre amount for each person accompanying the driver. CRA opined that the two parts of the allowance (base and additional amount per passenger) constituted a single allowance since both were intended for the same use of the vehicle. They then opined that as the allowance provided was not solely based on the number of kilometres travelled to perform the duties of employment, the entire allowance was taxable.

Ensure that allowances paid to employees meet the strict conditions for being tax-free to avoid a surprise tax bill for the recipient.

Short-Term Rentals: Denial of Expenses

In late 2023, the Federal government announced its intention to deny income tax deductions for expenses by non-compliant operators of short-term rental properties (such as Airbnb or VRBO properties rented for periods of less than 90 days). These rules would apply to individuals, corporations, and trusts with non-compliant short-term rentals. These rules are proposed to come into effect on January 1, 2024.

A short-term rental would be noncompliant if, at any time, either:

  • the province or municipality does not permit the short-term rental operation at the location of the residential property; or
  • the short-term rental operation is not compliant with all applicable registration, licensing, and permit requirements.

Many municipalities require a business license or permit for short-term rental operations. Where short-term rental activities are carried on without such a permit, the operator would be subject to these proposals and taxable on gross rental revenues with no deductions in 2024 and later years.

Residential property would include a house, apartment, condominium unit, cottage, mobile home, trailer, houseboat, and any other property legally permitted to be used for residential purposes.

No expenses incurred with respect to the non-compliant short-term rental would be deductible. For example, consider a short-term rental that incurred $100,000 in expenses to generate $20,000 in profit. If non-compliant, all expenses would be denied, resulting in a profit for tax purposes of $120,000. Assuming the individual owner was in the top tax bracket (53.53% in Ontario), they would pay tax of $64,236. As the actual profit was only $20,000, the effective tax rate would be 321% ($64,236/$20,000). In absolute dollars, the individual would have to pay $53,530 in additional taxes due to the denied expenses.

Where the short-term rental was non-compliant for part of the year and compliant for another part of the year, the total expenses incurred for all short-term rental activity would be pro-rated over the period of that activity to determine the nondeductible portion.
For example, assume that a property was used for long-term rental from January 1 to June 30, then converted to short-term rental on July 1. However, the owner did not obtain a business permit as required until September 1 (62 days non-compliant). Expenses for July 1 to December 31 (the short-term rental period, 184 days) would be 62/184 non-deductible. Expenses related to the long-term rental period would not be part of the calculation of non-deductible expenses.

Transitional rule

For the 2024 taxation year, if the taxpayer is compliant with all applicable registration, licensing, and permit requirements on December 31, 2024, they would be deemed compliant for the entire 2024 year and, as such, would be able to deduct all relevant expenses for 2024.

Ensure you comply with all municipal and provincial rules by December 31, 2024, to retain all deductions applicable to your short-term rental for the year.

GST/HST Returns: Mandatory Electronic Filing

For reporting periods that begin in 2024 and onwards, GST/HST registrants (except charities and selected financial institutions) must file all GST/HST returns with CRA electronically. Registrants who file their GST/HST returns on paper are subject to a penalty of $100 for the first offense and $250 for each subsequent return not filed electronically. While CRA waived these penalties for monthly and quarterly filers who failed to file returns electronically for periods beginning before March 31, 2024, the relief will end shortly.

Ensure that GST/HST returns are properly filed electronically to avoid these penalties.

Farm Losses can be Restricted: May Apply Even When Significant Time and Cash is Invested

A November 8, 2023, Tax Court of Canada case considered whether a taxpayer’s losses from farming activities deductible against non-farming income were restricted to the $17,500 ($2,500 plus half of the next $30,000) permitted by the restricted farm loss rules for the 2014 and 2015 years. The restriction applies where the taxpayer’s chief source of income for a taxation year is neither farming nor a combination of farming and some other source of income that is a subordinate source of income for the taxpayer.

The taxpayer was a physician but also operated a farm that produced organic beef. The taxpayer provided the following relevant details. (See chart below.)

  Medical Practice Farming
Gross Revenue $805,321 – 2014

$851,621 – 2015

$174,433 – 2014

$31,128 – 2015

Net Income (loss $648, 480 – 2014 $697,050 – 2015 ($530,363) – 2014 ($595,904) – 2015
Staff Employed Three part-time employees Four full-time employees and three seasonal part-time employees
Taxpayers’ Work Schedule Commenced work on weekdays between 7 am and 9 am and ended between 2 pm to 5 pm Five hours/day on weekdays (before and after performing physician duties) and 8-16 hours/day on the weekends
Hours Worked by Taxpayer (approx.) 1,900 hours/year 2,500 hours/year
Capital Investment There were no significant assets. The operating facilities were rented for $250/year from the municipality, likely as an incentive to maintain a local physician. The operation included over 800 head of cattle, 5,314 acres of land, three large shelter and storage buildings, a building for processing meat, two more buildings under construction, and various pieces of equipment such as tractors, trucks, and haying equipment.
History The taxpayer commenced a continually profitable practice as a physician in 1975. The farming operation commenced shortly after 1975. Various different crops/ products were attempted. Losses were reported in all years but two.
Taxpayer loses

The Court noted that the taxpayer’s farm activities took place before and after normal working hours and gave way to her medical practice if an issue arose that required her attention. As such, the Court found that the centre of the taxpayer’s routine was her medical practice. Further, the Court noted that the farm was only commenced after the medical practice and that all of the investment in the farm came from the medical practice. The farm required the cash inflow of the medical practice to survive. The farming business had always been subordinate to the medical practice as a source of income, rather than the other way around, and there was no demonstration that this would change in the foreseeable future. As such, the Court determined that the restricted farm loss rules would apply and the taxpayer’s deduction would be limited to $17,500.

Court’s additional commentary

The Court noted that the result was most unfortunate as it resulted in the denial of a loss for a bona fide farming business that would have been available to the operator of any other business. In particular, the Court noted how this case demonstrated the difficulty in growing a viable farming business with the current restricted farm loss rule punishing those willing to put in the significant time and capital required to do so.

ACTION: If farming activities consume a significant portion of your resources but you earn income from other significant sources as well, seek consultation to determine if farming losses may be restricted.

Personal Services Business (PSB): CRA Education Initiative

In general, a personal services business (PSB) exists where the individual performing the work would be considered to be an employee of the payer if it were not for the existence of the individual’s corporation. These workers are often referred to as incorporated employees. Where it is determined that the income is earned from a PSB, the corporate tax rate increases significantly (potentially as high as 39% over the small business rate, depending on the province). In addition, significantly fewer expenditures are deductible against the income.

Since 2022, CRA has been conducting an educational pilot project in respect of PSBs. They have recently published findings from the project and highlighted future planned phases.

Phase I – Identifying companies that hire PSBs

Phase I of the project was conducted from June to December 2022. The results were as follows:

  • approximately 10% of participating corporations were likely to be carrying on PSBs;
  • approximately 64% of potential PSBs were incorrectly claiming the small business deduction (an average of $16,711 of additional federal corporate tax would be payable if this were corrected);
  • nearly 74% of potential PSBs work in the following three industries:
    • transportation and warehousing (35%), with 95% of these working in freight trucking;
    • professional, scientific and technical services (26%); and
    • construction (13%).
Phase II – Identifying potential PSBs

CRA indicated that Phase II is planned for October 2023 to June 2024, and will examine approximately 2,100 randomly selected corporations identified as potential PSBs. The examination will include a voluntary interview and focus on the 2022 tax year. CRA indicated that they hope to gain greater insight into how and why PSBs operate the way they do.

Phase III – Assisted compliance for PSBs

CRA indicated that the timing of Phase III has not yet been determined. They expect to address the 2022 and subsequent tax years with continued education, review of PSBs and assisted compliance of non-compliant PSBs.

ACTION ITEM: Identification of PSBs has become a focal point for CRA. If there is a risk of your corporation carrying on a PSB, inquire as to the corporation’s exposure and potential mitigation strategies.

 

T-SLIPS: Filing and Distribution Issues

Various changes and issues have arisen in respect of T-slips to be filed and processed for the 2023 year.

Dental benefits

Beginning with the 2023 year, issuers of the T4 Statement of Remuneration Paid and T4A, Statement of Pension, Retirement, Annuity, and Other Income must report whether the recipient or any of their family members were eligible to access dental insurance or dental coverage of any kind (including health spending and wellness accounts) from their current or former employment.

The T4 will include new box 45, employer-offered dental benefits.

The T4A will include a new box 015, payer-offered dental benefits. This box must be completed if an amount is reported in box 016, pension or superannuation.

CRA indicated that it is mandatory to indicate whether the employee/former employee, or any of their family members were eligible, on December 31 of that year, to access any dental care insurance, or coverage of dental services of any kind, that the employer offered.

The employer/issuer must select which of the following scenarios apply.

  1. Not eligible to access any dental care insurance, or coverage of dental services of any kind
  2. Payee only
  3. Payee, spouse, and dependent children 4.Payee and their spouse 5.Payee and their dependent children
Electronic Distribution

In a December 13, 2023, update to CRA’s webpage, CRA discussed the ability to distribute T4, T4A, T5, and T4FHSA slips using the issuer’s secure electronic portal without obtaining written or electronic consent from the employees or recipients. However, using a secure electronic portal is not available where any of the following situations exist:

  • the employee or recipient requested that paper copies of the slips be provided;
  • the employee or recipient cannot reasonably be expected to have access to the slips in electronic format at the time the slips are issued; or
  • for T4s, if the issuer distributes the T4 when the employee is on extended leave or is a former employee at the time the slip is issued.

Employers/payers must also provide the option to receive these slips in paper form.

If distributing these slips by email, the employer/payer must receive consent in writing or electronic format before sending by email.

Electronic filing thresholds

Effective January 1, 2024, certain information returns must be filed electronically with CRA where more than 5 information returns (reduced from 50) of a particular type are required for a calendar year. The impacted information slips include forms NR4, T5007, T5018, T4ANR, T5, T5013, T4A, T4, and T3. A penalty of $125 will apply where between 6 and 50 slips are filed on paper.

Errors on T-slips

In a recent communication, CRA addressed the concern that auditors and appeals officers may base a decision on issued T-slips without considering the possibility that the issuer made an error in their preparation.

CRA stated that it is the taxpayer’s responsibility to verify the validity and accuracy of the information slip. If the taxpayer notices an error, the taxpayer should contact the issuer to attempt to discuss/resolve the issue. CRA noted that they cannot validate the accuracy of a slip as the relevant information to do so is retained by the issuer and the taxpayer. If the issuer refuses to correct the form, the taxpayer can inform CRA by filing an employee complaint with the employer accounts and services section.

When a taxpayer objects to CRA’s assessment/ reassessment, the taxpayer must provide the reason for the objection. The appeals officer should investigate the accuracy of the information slip when it is part of the disputed issue. The appeals officer may also ask the taxpayer to provide representations.

ACTION ITEM: Various changes to T-slip completion, filing, and distribution are effective for 2023 slips, filed in early 2024. Ensure that these changes are incorporated into your business processes.

CANADA DENTAL CARE PLAN (CDCP): New Income-tested Benefit

On December 11, 2023, Health Canada issued details on the Canada dental care plan that would cover a wide variety of dental services for certain Canadian residents. The plan will be rolled out from late 2023 to 2025.

To be eligible, the individual and their spouse or commonlaw partner (if applicable) must meet all of the following conditions:

  • have an adjusted family net income (AFNI) of less than $90,000;
  • be a Canadian resident for tax purposes;
  • have filed their tax return in the previous year; and
  • not have access to dental insurance, meaning that it is not available through the taxpayer’s or a family member’s employer or pension, or not purchased through a group plan.

Eligibility for children under 18 will be determined by their parents’/guardians’ eligibility.

Individuals will need to meet the eligibility requirements annually. More information on the annual reassessment process will be provided by the government at a later date.

The CDCP will pay for eligible services provided by an oral health provider (such as dentists, denturists, dental hygienists, and dental specialists), less a portion that is to be paid directly by the patient (the “co-payment”). No copayment is required if AFNI is under $70,000. The co-payment starts at 40% for AFNI between $70,000 and $79,999 and increases to 60% for AFNI between $80,000 and $89,999.

Oral health providers are encouraged to follow the CDCP fees, which are not the same as the provincial and territorial fee guides, so their patients do not face additional charges at the point of care. Oral health providers who have enrolled with CDCP will bill the plan directly. Health Canada noted that patients should ask if the provider has enrolled in the CDCP when booking their appointment to limit unexpected out-of-pocket payments.

The program will be first rolled out to seniors with application invitation letters starting in December 2023. Eligible seniors will be able to engage in covered services as early as May 2024. Those with a disability tax credit certificate (T2201) or under 18 years of age can begin to apply as of June 2024. The remaining eligible residents will be able to apply in 2025.

CRA noted that only those who are 70 years old or older by March 31, 2024, have AFNI of less than $90,000 for 2022, and were Canadian tax residents for 2022 will receive the initial application instruction letters.

Once an individual has applied and is determined to be eligible, Service Canada will share the individual’s information with Sun Life, the contracted service provider, for enrolment into the CDCP. Eligible individuals will receive a member card, and be notified of the start date of their coverage. The start date will vary based on when each group can apply, when the application is received and when enrollment is completed.

Oral health providers will be able to enroll voluntarily as a participating CDCP provider directly with Sun Life in early 2024. Details on this process will be available on Health Canada’s webpage when enrollment opens. Oral health providers enrolled in the CDCP will be required to submit the claims directly to Sun Life for payment rather than having patients seek reimbursement from Sun Life for services covered under the plan.

ACTION: If you are an eligible individual, apply for this new benefit when invited. If you are a oral health care provider, consider enrolling as a provider in the plan.

Working from Home Expenses: Employment Expenses

The $2/day flat rate method available to claim expenses for employees working from home was a temporary administrative measure only available from 2020 to 2022; it is no longer available in 2023. As such, employees working from home can only use the detailed calculation when claiming expenses.

For 2023 and subsequent years, a deduction can only be claimed where one of the following criteria is met:

  1. the work space was the place where the individual principally (more than 50% of the time) performed their duties of employment; or
  2. the individual used the space exclusively during the period to earn employment income and used it on a regular and continuous basis for meeting clients, customers, or other people with respect to employment.

CRA indicated that they would consider i) to be met by employees who were required to work from home more than 50% of the time for a period of at least four consecutive weeks in the year.

ACTION ITEM: The $2/day temporary flat rate method cannot be used by employees to claim home office expenses in 2023. Instead, receipts and records must be kept to make claims under the detailed method.