Tax Considerations for Canadian Snowbirds

Canada is known for its long and frigid winters. Many Canadians, often referred to as snowbirds travel south to the USA to escape the freezing Canadian temperatures, taking extended vacations to enjoy the year-round warmth that parts of the United States have to offer. These so-called snowbirds should carefully plan their stays in the USA, however, since a stay exceeding a specific number of days might have unintended Canadian and US income tax consequences.
 
Canadian income tax consequences for snowbirds

Snowbirds should continue to file their Canadian tax return, as usual, reporting any worldwide income earned in the year on their T1 income tax and benefit return, whether received from inside or outside of Canada. Similarly, they should claim all the applicable deductions and credits and pay the federal and provincial or territorial taxes based on their residential ties. This generally means that any income earned by the snowbirds from the USA should be reported in their T1 return. However, to avoid double taxation, they will be able to claim a credit for the amount of any US tax paid by them, thereby reducing their Canadian tax liabilities.

US income tax consequences for snowbirds

On spending a significant amount of time in the USA, snowbirds might not realize that they may be subject to US income tax obligations by becoming, in effect, US residents as per the US tax residency rules. For US tax purposes, the residential status of a snowbird is determined under either of the US domestic tax rules for residency below. If they meet either of these tests, they will be considered a US resident and will need to comply with US income tax laws.

  1. Physically present in the USA in the current calendar year for more than 183 days
  2. Substantial presence test (SPT)

Snowbirds who are in the USA for less than 183 days in the current year can still be treated as US residents for tax purposes if they meet the SPT.

The SPT would be met if they are physically present in the USA for at least:

  • 31 days during the current year; and
  • A total of 183 days during the three-year period that includes the current and the immediately preceding two years, counting:
    • All the days they were present in the USA in the current year, and
    • One-third of the days they were present in the USA in the first year before the current year, and
    • One-sixth of the days they were present in the USA in the second year before the current year.

It is worth noting that for the SPT, a day generally includes any part of the day spent in the USA unless the individual is in transit through the USA. Furthermore, the purpose of the stay in the USA does not affect the SPT.

There are certain exceptions from the tests above that exempt snowbirds from being treated as US residents for tax purposes. These are discussed below.

1.    Canada–US income tax treaty “tie-breaker” provision – greater than 183 days

The tie-breaker rule in the income tax treaty between Canada and the USA  allows a taxpayer treated as a tax resident of both the USA and Canada under their domestic tax rules to only be treated as a resident of the country to which they have stronger ties to. Essentially, this rule will allow the taxpayer to remain a resident of one country as opposed to two. 

To be exempt under the treaty, snowbirds must demonstrate that they have stronger ties with Canada than the USA, including a permanent home, social/economic ties, habitual abode, and citizenship. In addition, they must file Form 1040NR along with a fully completed Form 8833 (treaty-based return position disclosure) explaining why they should be considered a resident of Canada and not a resident of the USA. The filing due date of both the forms—Form 1040NR and Form 8833—is June 15 of each year.

2.    Closer connection exception—SPT

Even after meeting the requirements of the SPT in a given year, snowbirds may still be able to avoid being considered US residents using the closer connection exception. Under this exception, snowbirds need to demonstrate:

  • A “closer connection” to Canada, and 
  • That they were in the USA for less than 183 days in the year.

To claim this exception, snowbirds must first establish that they maintained more significant residential ties with Canada than with the USA. A closer connection generally exists if their social and economic ties (such as the location of a permanent home; family connections; personal belongings; business and banking ties; and social, political, cultural, or religious affiliations, etc.) remain closer to Canada. Secondly, they have to stay in the USA for less than 183 days during the year for which the exception is claimed. On satisfying both these conditions, snowbirds can fall under the closer connection exception.

In addition, they must file a US Form 8840 (closer connection exception statement for aliens) for each year for which the SPT is met, and the closer connection exception is claimed. Similar to Forms 1040NR and 8833, the filing deadline for Form 8840 is June 15 of the year following the end of the relevant tax year unless the filing date falls on a weekend or a holiday. Filing the form will allow them to maintain their tax status as a non-resident of the USA under US tax law.

Snowbirds owning US real property

Snowbirds owning US real estate property might be liable for US income tax regardless of whether they are treated as a US resident for tax purposes. While owning and using US real estate property only for personal purposes might require them to report the property on their T1 return, they do not have any US annual filing obligations with regard to that property. However, renting the US property for more than 15 days during the year or the eventual sale of the property may trigger US tax and filing obligations. 

Snowbirds renting out their homes in the USA for more than 15 days during the year and earning rental income from investment properties are usually subject to a 30%  US non-resident withholding rate which satisfies their US tax requirements. However, snowbirds can make an election to be taxed on net rental income (after taking into consideration certain expenses related to the rental income) at graduated tax rates applicable to the individual which can be more beneficial and reduce the tax liability. However, to elect to file on a net rental basis, the taxpayer will need to complete Form W-8ECI to avoid the 30% withholding tax. The form applies to a foreign national who is the beneficial owner of the US source income that is (or is deemed to be) effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the USA.

If the election is filed, the snowbird will be required to file a US tax return (Form 1040NR) to report the net rental income.

The taxpayer will require a US tax identification number to make this election and to file the US return.

Similarly, the sale of a US property would be subject to a 15% US non-resident withholding rate on the gross sale price at the closing date. However, the snowbird can file a waiver to have this withholding based on the net capital gain (if any) and/or claim a possible exemption. The snowbird would then report the net capital gain realized from the sale on a US tax return and claim any withholding as an instalment toward their final liability.

Since US net rental income or US net capital gain would also have to be reported on their Canadian tax return, the snowbird can claim any US tax paid on their US return as a credit on their Canadian return to reduce their Canadian tax and avoid double taxation.

Key takeaways

While an extended vacation to warmer locales may be an excellent way to beat the Canadian winter blues, travellers must keep abreast of any US tax reporting obligations they may be subject to. Keeping track of the number of days spent in the USA is an important first step for all snowbirds. Staying under the 183-day threshold may help snowbirds avoid any unintended tax consequences.




This article was written by Frank Casciaro, Chetna Thapar, Danielle Wallace and originally appeared on 2022-07-28 RSM Canada, and is available online at https://rsmcanada.com/insights/services/business-tax-insights/tax-considerations-for-canadian-snowbirds.html.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.

DJB is a proud member of RSM Canada Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms across North America. RSM Canada Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM Canada LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the Canadian member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM Canada Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how DJB can assist you, please contact us.

Association and HST

In the tax world, association can have a significant impact on your income taxes, but it can also impact your GST/HST as well.   When it comes to having to register for GST/HST, the small supplier threshold of $30,000 (or $50,000 for public service bodies) applies to a company and its associates.  Association is defined in section 127 of the Excise Tax Act (ETA) and subsections 256 (1) to (6) of the Income Tax Act (ITA).  The rules of association for ITA purposes can be found at:  http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/I-3.3/section-256.html

When it comes to association and GST/HST, a common error is not factoring in all of the taxable sales of all associated parties when looking at the small supplier test.  Unlike the ITA definition of association, which applies to corporations only, the ETA extends this definition to apply to other persons (such as individuals).  It is common for an individual who controls a corporation to charge management fees or commercial rent to their corporation.  Assuming the corporation they control is not a small supplier, due to the association rules, these fees would be taxable for GST/HST.  Having the individual registered and charging for these services is often overlooked on the incorrect assumption they are not taxable if under $30,000 of taxable supplies.  Please note the appropriateness and income tax consequences of such management fees are beyond the scope of this article.

It should also be noted that, as a trust and a partnership is a person for GST/HST purposes, they should also be factored into association with any corporations with common ownership.

If you have a corporate group with transactions amongst all of the entities and shareholders, it would be prudent to have a GST/HST review done to ensure that all taxes are being charged appropriately.

Inflation, Interest Rates Will Have a Surprising Effect on Your Taxes Next Year

The Bank of Canada’s decision this week to hold its benchmark interest rate steady at 5% as it attempts to battle inflation was welcome news for many. But the effects of both higher interest rates and inflation on the tax system will be felt in the new year in at least a couple of ways based on recent economic data available over the past week or so.

First, let’s start with the interest rate environment. It appears that even though the central bank’s rate isn’t rising, the Canada Revenue Agency’s prescribed interest rate will indeed increase (yet again) as of Jan. 1, 2024. The prescribed rate is set quarterly and is tied directly to the yield on Government of Canada three-month Treasury bills, but with a lag.

The calculation is based on a formula in the Income Tax Regulations that takes the simple average of three-month Treasury bills for the first month of the preceding quarter, rounded up to the next highest whole percentage point (if not already a whole number).

To calculate the rate for the upcoming quarter (Jan. 1 through March 31, 2024), we look at the first month of the current quarter (October 2023) and take the average of the three-month T-bill yields, which were 5.16% (Oct. 10) and also 5.16% (Oct. 24). Since the prescribed rate is then rounded up to the nearest whole percentage point, we get 6% for the new prescribed rate for the first quarter of 2024. Contrast this with the historically low rate of 1% we had from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. The last time the prescribed rate was 6% was more than 20 years ago in the second quarter of 2001.

The hike in the prescribed rate has a number of implications. To understand these, we should point out that there are, in reality, three prescribed rates: the base rate, the rate paid for tax refunds, and the rate charged for unpaid taxes. The base rate, which will be increasing to 6% (from 5%) on Jan. 1, applies to taxable benefits for employees and shareholders, low-interest loans, and other related party transactions.

The rate for tax refunds is two percentage points higher than the base rate, meaning that if the CRA owes you money, the rate of interest will be 8% as of Jan. 1. Note, however, that rushing to file your 2023 tax return as early as possible next tax filing season won’t necessarily get you that rate on your refund, because the CRA only pays refund interest on amounts it owes you after May 30, assuming you filed by the deadline.

Finally, if you owe the CRA money, or if you’re late or deficient in one of your quarterly tax instalments, then the rate the CRA charges is a full four percentage points higher than the base rate. This puts the interest rate on tax debts, penalties, insufficient instalments, unpaid income tax, Canada Pension Plan contributions, and employment insurance premiums at a whopping 10% come Jan. 1.

Keep in mind that this interest is compounded daily and is not tax deductible. For example, if you’re a resident of Newfoundland and Labrador and in the highest 2023 tax bracket of 55%, that means you’d have to find an investment that earns a guaranteed, pre-tax rate of return of 22% to be better off than paying down your tax debt.

The other recent economic news that will impact taxpayers in 2024 is the latest inflation number. The tax brackets and most other amounts in the tax system are indexed to inflation. While the inflation indexation factor for 2024 that will be applied to the tax brackets and various other amounts won’t officially be released by the CRA until November, we can do a rough calculation based on the consumer price index (CPI) data released by Statistics Canada last week.

The federal indexation factor for 2024 is calculated as the average of the monthly CPI numbers for the 12-month period ended Sept. 30, 2023, divided by the average of the monthly CPI factors for the 12-month period ended Sept. 30, 2022. The September CPI data released last week showed a 3.8% increase over the past 12 months. We can then use this data to finalize the 2024 indexation factor, which should come in at 4.7%. By comparison, the 2023 indexation factor was 6.3%.

The silver lining in the latest inflationary number is that the tax-free savings account (TFSA) limit for 2024 should go up to $7,000, an increase from the current 2023 limit of $6,500. Note that this marks the first time the TFSA limit has risen in two consecutive years, as it was $6,000 in 2022.

The TFSA was first introduced in the 2008 federal budget and became available to Canadians for the 2009 calendar year. Its initial limit of $5,000 rose to $5,500 and stayed there for a number of years, with a short-lived flirtation at $10,000 in 2015. Under the tax rules, starting in 2016 and for each subsequent year, the annual TFSA dollar limit was fixed at $5,000, indexed to inflation for each year after 2009, and rounded to the nearest $500, which makes the annual limits easy to remember.

The TFSA limit only gets increased, therefore, when the cumulative effect of the annual inflation adjustments is enough to push the limit to the next highest $500 increment. The indexed TFSA dollar amount for 2024 is now at $6,859, meaning that the official limit gets boosted to $7,000, the closest $500 increment.

For someone who has never contributed to a TFSA and has been a resident of Canada and at least 18 years of age since 2009, the total contribution room available in 2024 will rise to $95,000 from $88,000 in 2023.

CEBA REPAYMENT DEADLINE EXTENDED: Some Issues

On September 14, 2023, the Department of Finance provided details on extending the deadline for Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) repayments, including the following key elements:

  • the deadline to qualify for partial loan forgiveness (by paying the non-forgivable portion) has been extended from December 31, 2023, to January 18, 2024;
  • if a refinancing application is made with the financial institution that provided the CEBA loan by January 18, 2024, the deadline to qualify for partial loan forgiveness will be extended to March 28, 2024;
  • as of January 19, 2024, outstanding loans will convert to three-year term loans subject to a 5% annual interest rate regardless of whether refinancing is sought; and
  • the previous final repayment deadline of December 31, 2025, has been extended to December 31, 2026.

Financial institutions will contact CEBA loan holders directly regarding their loans. The above changes also apply to CEBA-equivalent lending through the Regional Relief and Recovery Fund.

ACTION ITEM: Ensure you fully understand the deadlines to avoid missing the partial loan forgiveness.

PAYING RENT TO NON-RESIDENTS: Withholdings
Required

In a March 30, 2023, Tax Court of Canada case, the taxpayer was assessed for failing to withhold taxes on rent paid on Canadian real estate to a non-resident. Penalties and interest were also assessed.

The information known to the taxpayer was limited to an Italian telephone number on the lease document (with a Canadian number), the landlord’s email address ending with “.it” rather than “.ca” or “.com” and some Italian writing at the bottom of an email. The taxpayer argued that he did not know that the landlord was a non-resident, and that a due diligence defence should apply.

Taxpayer loses

The Court first noted that a non-resident is subject to a 25% flat tax on gross rent received on Canadian property. The Canadian resident paying the rent is required to withhold and remit this tax and is liable for it if this is not done. Penalties and interest on this amount also apply.

The Court then noted that the withholding requirement exists regardless of whether or not the taxpayer knows that the landlord is non-resident. Further, there is no due diligence defence in respect of the tax withholding. As such, the taxpayer was liable for the tax not withheld.

The Court stated that a due diligence defence could apply to penalties and interest. However, the taxpayer provided no evidence of any efforts to confirm the landlord’s residency. The absence of any reason to question the landlord’s residency was insufficient – due diligence requires taking positive steps to ensure compliance.

ACTION: Ensure to take proactive steps to understand a landlord’s residency status. Renters can be liable for unremitted withholdings even if they do not know the landlord’s residency status.

Considerations for Implementing AI in a Professional Services Firm

Ignoring the growth in Artificial intelligence (AI) is not sustainable.  AI is changing how companies in all industries conduct business, creating efficiencies and in some cases, lowering costs. 

With 35% of companies in all industries using AI to date and another 42% implementing a formalized strategy within their business, it appears that AI is here to stay.

So how can professional services firms embrace AI and leverage it for more successful outcomes?  In this article written by RSM Canada, they highlight the key areas that professional services firms need to consider before jumping right in.

Things like, what processes can be replaced by AI, how it may change the billable hours model, potential privacy issues, and the importance of continuing to have human oversight throughout the process.  

 

GIFTS DIRECTED TO OTHER DONEES: Loss of
Charitable Status

In some situations, a registered charity may be asked to receive donations on behalf of another organization or cause. While this may seem like a good way to generate funds and reward donors with charitable contribution receipts, it can have serious implications for the charity.

A February 1, 2023, Technical Interpretation considered a charity that would collect funds, issue receipts, and then disburse the funds to a qualified donee (a municipality). The municipality would then direct the funds to a non-qualified donee. The charity’s intention was to assist a non-qualified donee (in this case, a non-profit organization) in a fundraising campaign by collecting funds and issuing receipts.

A charity may have its status revoked if the charity:

  • carries on a business that is not a related business of that charity;
  • fails to expend amounts in any taxation year on charitable activities carried on by the charity and by way of qualifying disbursements, the total of which is at least equal to the charity’s disbursement quota for that year; or
  • makes a disbursement, other than
    • one made in the course of charitable activities carried on by it, or
    • a qualifying disbursement.

If the charity’s disbursement to the municipality was not a qualifying disbursement, the charity could have its status revoked.

A qualifying disbursement includes a gift to a qualified donee. A qualified donee includes a municipality in Canada that is registered by the Minister.

It is a question of fact as to whether the transfer to the qualified donee constituted a gift received, and therefore a qualifying disbursement. CRA’s general view is that donations can be received and receipted by a qualified donee (such as the municipality), provided that the qualified donee retains discretion regarding how the donated funds will be spent. If a qualified donee is merely acting as a conduit by collecting funds from donors, including a charity, on behalf of an organization that is legally or otherwise entitled to the funds so donated, the qualified donee is not in receipt of a gift. In this case, the gift from the charity would not be a qualifying disbursement.

A charity may also have its status revoked if it accepts a gift, the granting of which was conditional on the charity making a gift to another person, club, society, association, or organization other than a qualified donee.

ACTION: Caution and professional guidance should be sought should a charity consider accepting donations on behalf of another organization.

Tax Planning: 2023 Year-end Considerations for Businesses and Individuals

RSM Canada’s 2023 year-end tax guide summarizes the key federal, provincial, and territorial tax updates that may create risk or opportunity for middle-market taxpayers in 2024 and beyond.

Tax trends and topics discussed as the Canadian economy moves into 2024 include:

  • Revisions to the general anti-avoidance rule
  • Mandatory disclosure rules
  • Financial institutions dividend
  • Tax on repurchase of equity

As year-end approaches, companies and individuals alike must carefully consider tax-planning opportunities in light of economic uncertainty and evolving tax legislation and regulations. Learn more in our year-end planner.

 

 

Canadian tax integration on private company Income

Tax integration is achieved when a particular stream of income is subject to the same or similar total tax rate once it reaches the individual taxpayer level. These tables provide an illustration of how the Canadian income tax integration system works.