How Do I Correct My GST/HST Return?

It isn’t uncommon that you find an error in your accounting records after you have already filed your GST/HST return.  The CRA has stated policies on its website about how to fix common problems such as forgetting to claim input tax credits (ITC) or correcting your GST/HST collected amount.

Forgotten ITCs

The CRA states that if you forgot to include an ITC, which you were entitled to, you are not to adjust your return. Instead, they require you to include any missed ITCs in your next GST/HST filing.   In most instances, you have up to four years to claim your ITCs.  Other than lost cash flow, you will eventually get to claim the credit you are eligible for.  For more on the time limits for claiming ITCs please refer to CRA’s website.

Correcting a previously filed GST/HST return

If you need to change the amount of GST/HST collected or collectible or make any other change to another line, the CRA states not to file another return. Instead, they ask that you request an adjustment for the reporting period that contains the incorrect or missing amount, indicating:

  • your 9-digit business number;
  • the GST/HST reporting period to be amended; and
  • the corrected or revised amounts for each line number on your GST/HST return

Most changes can be made either through the online service: My Business Account, if you are registered for this service, or by sending a letter to your tax centre.    You will need to send a letter to your tax centre following the guidelines above.  Find your tax centre.

If you had significant errors on your return, especially unreported amounts, you may want to consider filing any adjustments through the CRA’s Voluntary Disclosure Program, which you can find more information.

If you are having issues getting the correct information from your accounting software, or have noticed prior errors in your GST/HST filings, we would be pleased to help correct these returns, in addition to implementing an appropriate reporting system for you and your company.

Can Artificial Intelligence be useful to Law Firms?

The professional services industry is beginning to feel the impact of the uncertain economy, with clients becoming increasingly cautious of large capital expenditures.

Until there is a bit more certainty in the economy, law firms specifically may need to explore growth opportunities through mergers and acquisitions.

This article, authored by RSM Canada, provides an economic overview of the professional services industry and insights for the immediate future, exploring whether the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) will help or hinder the industry.

 

VIDEO LEGACY: What Message Am I Leaving?

When conducting our estate plans, we are often focused on the distribution of assets (such as homes, bank accounts, investments, and interest in private corporations), providing for dependents, and ensuring overall family harmony. However, softer issues may be overlooked. For example, some suggest that it may be useful to leave a video legacy for surviving family members to view after a loved one passes.

One app, RecordMeNow, allows users to make a video legacy through targeted question-prompting and video recording. Users can create a video library organized into different subject areas for the surviving loved ones. As an individual’s death can rarely be predicted with certainty, the founder advises recording a legacy due to the risk of an untimely death.

The service was originally developed such that children who lost parents at a young age would have something to connect with their deceased parent(s); however, it can be used by individuals of all ages.

For further information see the BBC article (If you die early, how will your children remember you?, Shaw, Douglas), or go to www.recordmenow.org.

ACTION ITEM: What would happen if you were to pass away unexpectedly? Is everything in place such that in the days and years following, the desired results would be achieved? Consider revisiting your estate plan, will, and any other communications you would like to leave for your family.

2023 Provincial Budget – Ontario

Authored by RSM Canada

On March 21, 2023, Ontario tabled their 2023 Provincial Budgets. To help understand the implications of the budgets across major industries, we have consolidated the key highlights pertinent to middle market companies.


This article was written by Clara Pham and originally appeared on 2023-05-02. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmcanada.com/insights/services/business-tax-insights/2023-provincial-budget-ontario.html

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

New Amendments to Foreign Buyer Ban Regulations

On March 27, 2023, the Federal Government announced that they are amending some of the problematic aspects of the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by Non-Canadians Act’s associated Regulations, which we highlighted in an earlier article: New Regulations Prohibit Builders/Developers with Whole or Partial Foreign Ownership from Purchasing Canadian Residential Property.

The government has amended the Regulation to include an exception that allows for all entities, including those with some foreign ownership, to purchase residential property for the purpose of development, which will now enable all business entities in Canada, regardless of ownership structure, to contribute to increasing Canada’s housing supply.

The announcement also repeals section 3(2) of the Regulations. This section formerly prohibited Canadian entities with more than 3% foreign ownership from buying vacant land for residential development, thereby negatively impacting many Canadian-based business entities from contributing to the much-needed housing supply for Canadians. Vacant land zoned for residential and mixed-use can now be purchased and used for any purpose by the purchaser, including residential development.

Other changes announced today include increasing the foreign ownership threshold to 10% from 3%, though this threshold will no longer be an issue for builders/developers/renovators looking to add to Canada’s housing supply given the previous changes listed above.

Read the government’s full announcement.

How to Financially Prepare for Divorce

Jane is divorced. Going through divorce was a difficult time, not just for her but for her entire family. The emotions were draining, but the financial strain made it even worse.

As Jane prepared for divorce, there were so many decisions to be made quickly. She knew she had to be proactive to protect her financial well-being.

Jane first needed to understand her financial situation before entering the divorce process. She started by compiling her financial records – tax returns, loan documents, retirement accounts, bank statements, and investment statements. Then, with her accountant’s help, Jane was able to fully understand where she stood financially.

Jane also pulled her credit report to ensure she knew all her accounts and liabilities. She made a comprehensive list of all her assets that could be divided during the divorce, including their marital home, investments, pensions, personal property, and more.

Next, Jane opened new personal bank accounts and closed her joint accounts with her soon-to-be ex-husband. She updated all her direct deposits to her new account and started paying her bills using those accounts. Importantly, to avoid being responsible for any debt her husband may accrue post-divorce, she also paid off and cancelled any joint credit cards.

Jane wanted to ensure her wishes were honoured in the event of her death – and that her former husband wouldn’t have access to her private information. She updated her Will and Power of Attorney, designating new beneficiaries on her investment accounts and insurance policies.

Jane also changed her mailing address to keep her mail private during the divorce proceedings. She wanted to ensure that any correspondence from her lawyer or information about her finances wouldn’t fall into the wrong hands.

Finally, Jane wanted to avoid losing assets or handing over more than she had planned. To do this, she refrained from making significant financial decisions until the divorce was finalized. Instead, she worked with legal and financial professionals to make sure her best interests were protected throughout the process.

Jane had to figure out her new income post-divorce and set a budget. She needed to get her life back on track. With her financial planner, she determined all her monthly inflows, debt payments, and fixed expenses and allocated her discretionary spending accordingly. Together, Jane and her financial planner started a new financial plan and set new, achievable goals. She also reviewed her investments with her portfolio manager to make sure they aligned with her new financial goals and comfort level.

Today, with the help of the right professionals, including her accountant, financial planner, and portfolio manager, Jane can finally start fresh post-divorce and have financial peace of mind.

Are you at the start, or in the middle of a divorce? Remember these steps.
  • Compile your financial records and assess your personal assets.
  • Open new bank accounts and credit cards.
  • Close joint accounts and pay off/close joint credit cards.
  • Update your Will, Power of Attorney, and insurance policies, including beneficiaries.
  • Update your mailing address if you no longer live in the marital home.
  • Refrain from making significant financial decisions that may be included in the division of
    property.
Starting Fresh, Post-Divorce
Determine your new income and set a budget.

Post-divorce, your cash flows are likely to change drastically. So first, determine all your monthly inflows, debt payments and fixed expenses. From there, figure out how to allocate your discretionary spending.

Start your financial plan.

Your future looks different than the last time you did a financial plan. Work with your advisor to lay out new objectives and determine the next steps to get your financial life back on track.

Review your investments.

Your investment objectives may have changed since your divorce, or it may be your first time learning about investing. Talk to your portfolio manager and ensure your portfolio aligns with your objectives and comfort level.

Work with your accountant, financial planner, and portfolio manager to clearly understand your financial position and set you on the right path to financial well-being post-divorce.

Insights on Operational Efficiency for the Family Office

The family enterprise is tasked with maximizing efficiency and productivity amidst constant change and uncertainty in the business environment today.

A big focus and looming concern for many family offices is the ability to achieve operational excellence as they consider the latest trends and strategies to evolve their current operating model.  

In this study conducted by RSM Canada, they found three key takeaways related to data, technology, and talent.  

Managing increasing prescribed interest rates on loans

Authored by RSM Canada

With rampant inflation and growing interest rates, Canadians everywhere are bracing for a looming recession. The interest rates applicable for tax planning in Canada have been increasing as well, leaving many tax decisions that once made sense to now being much tougher to manage economically. Interest rates applicable for tax planning refer to the prescribed interest rates, which are computed quarterly and published online by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

This article is the second article in the series with a focus on the impact of increasing prescribed interest rates on certain tax-planning loans. You can find the first article here, which discusses how increasing prescribed interest rates impacts income tax reassessments.

Employer-provided home purchase loans

Under certain employment circumstances, employees are able to take advantage of low-interest loans offered by their employers to purchase a dwelling. These housing loans have certain beneficial tax attributes, including that the loan itself would not be considered employment income. Rather, the employee would only have taxable income inclusion equal to the prescribed interest rate times the principal amount owing less any interest actually paid on the loan.

The prescribed interest rate on these types of loans is fixed at the rate at the time the loan was made. Therefore, if the loan was first made a few years ago, it would still be fixed at the prescribed interest rate of 1%. However, there is a mandatory 5-year “refresh” on home purchase loans, deeming a new loan to arise at that time. This means that any housing loans previously taking advantage of historically low prescribed interest rates may soon be up for a refresh at current prescribed interest rates.

As an example, assume there was an outstanding home purchase loan issued to an employee for $250,000 on January 1, 2018, requiring to be repaid by January 1, 2028. The loan did not require any interest to be paid and the employee was including $2,500 (1% prescribed interest rate times $250,000) in their taxable income each year since 2018. On January 1, 2023, there was a mandatory refresh of the loan, meaning it now carries the Q1 2023 prescribed interest rate of 4%. Assuming there has been no principal repayments yet, the inclusion to taxable income for 2023 has now increased to $10,000 (4% prescribed interest rate times $250,000). Depending on the employee’s marginal tax rates this could mean an increase of taxes owing of almost $4,000.

Taxpayers who may be affected by this mandatory refresh should start considering if it still makes financial sense to have the home purchase loan or if they should refinance.

Prescribed rate loans

A common way to avoid adverse tax implications on certain types of loans is to have the loan carry the prescribed interest rate. For example, individuals can generally borrow funds from a corporation they own for a short term at the prescribed interest rate and only need to include that interest in their taxable income. These type of financing options may have historically been effective, but given the recent increases to prescribed interest rates, this may no longer be a sound strategy.

Prescribed rate loans are also used in income splitting strategies for high-net-worth families by utilizing a family trust to hold income-earning securities. The trust then distributes the income earned to its beneficiaries, typically minors or a spouse, to attempt to split the investment income earnings across taxpayers with lower marginal tax rates. While this strategy can be thwarted under certain circumstances, one way to make sure the planning works as intended is to utilize a prescribed rate loan. Typically, this involves a high-income-earning family member to loan funds to the family trust at the prescribed interest rate.

In contrast with home purchase loans, there is no mandatory refresh of these loans. Instead, these loans remain outstanding indefinitely as long as the taxpayer continues to meet the relevant criteria. This means that taxpayers are incentivized to enter into these loans when the prescribed interest rate is as low as possible. The reason for this is because the interest paid on the loan is taxable to the creditor, typically the high-income-earning family member. As such, the higher the interest rate, the larger the income inclusion to an individual likely already at the highest marginal tax rate.

If taxpayers were interested in utilizing this type of planning right now, they have until March 30, 2023 to lock in the current prescribed interest rate of 4%. Despite the rate being relatively high, economically is still may make sense to take advantage of this planning. For example, assume that a high-income-earning family member paying tax at a marginal rate of 50% has $500,000 of excess cash they would otherwise have invested themselves in a security that yields 6% annually. They could consider a prescribed rate loan plan where they lend the $500,000 to a family trust at an interest rate of 4% which would then invest in a security that yields 6% annually.

If the taxpayer loaned the funds on January 1, 2023, the following tax results would occur for the 2023 taxation year:

High-income-earning family member

Family trust

Revenues

Interest income on loan: $20,000
($500,000 x 4%)

Security yield: $30,000
($500,000 x 6%)

Expenses

Interest expense on loan: $20,000
($500,000 x 4%)

Net income

$20,000

$10,000

Approximate tax owing @ 50%

$10,000

Absent this planning, the high-income-earning family member would have earned $30,000 on the security themselves and pay an approximate tax of $15,000. The planning has effectively saved approximately $5,000 of taxes annually ($30,000 * 50% vs $20,000 * 50%).

The take-away

Tax planning involving loans is not static, it requires constant attention and reevaluation of effectiveness regularly. Even if a plan made sense a certain time ago, changes in economic circumstances can change that drastically.


This article was written by Daniel Mahne and originally appeared on 2023-03-24. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmcanada.com/insights/services/business-tax-insights/managing-increasing-prescribed-interest-rates-on-loans.html

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

UNREPORTED REAL ESTATE DISPOSITIONS: Multiple Issues

A September 12, 2022, Tax Court of Canada case reviewed the gain on a residential property purchased in 2007 and disposed of in 2011. The property was substantially rebuilt during the ownership period. The proceeds, cost, and gain were all determined by CRA as the sale was unreported. These amounts were largely unchallenged by the taxpayer and accepted by the Court. The Court noted that the taxpayer’s tumultuous relations with her ex-husband, whom she divorced in 2014, resulted in “an off-again/on-again cohabitation” during much of the relevant period.

Although the taxpayer argued that the property was her principal residence, CRA denied it, assessing the gain as an adventure in the nature of trade and, therefore, fully taxable. CRA also assessed outside the normal reassessment period of three years and applied gross negligence penalties.

Capital property or adventure in the nature of trade?

The Court accepted that the taxpayer lived at this property from time to time during the ownership period, a personal use inconsistent with a business venture of acquiring, improving, and selling the property for a profit. In addition, the taxpayer was a teacher not connected to the real estate sector. Her marital difficulties demonstrated a plausible reason for acquiring this larger residence for personal use as a residence in which to start a family. There was no suggestion that the reconstruction was undertaken for purposes other than for personal use. The nature of the property, length of ownership, lack of prior or subsequent activity in real estate, and her personal circumstances all led to the conclusion that the property was acquired for personal use and not resale, so it was a capital property.

Principal residence?

The property was used as an intermittent refuge and was never occupied with regularity. In the absence of evidence such as a change of address, domestic expenses beyond mandatory utilities, or other permanent hallmarks, the Court could not conclude that the property was ordinarily inhabited, preventing it from being the taxpayer’s principal residence. As such, the taxpayer could not claim the principal residence exemption on the disposition.

Statute-barred?

The Court acknowledged that a fully exempt principal residence sale was not required to be disclosed in the taxpayer’s 2011 personal tax return. However, the taxpayer provided no details to show a reasonable basis for believing the gains were fully exempt. Without such evidence, she could not support her defense that the failure to report the gain was based on a reasoned and thoughtful assessment of her filing position rather than a result of carelessness or neglect, as CRA asserted. As she could not disprove CRA’s assertions, the return could be assessed outside the normal reassessment period.

Note that all principal residence sales were required to be disclosed in an individual’s tax return starting in 2016. If not reported, the individual could not claim the principal residence exemption on the disposition of the property and would be liable for the tax on the gain on disposition. As the taxpayer’s disposition was in 2011, this issue was not addressed in the Court case

Gross negligence?

The Court noted that CRA’s gross negligence penalty assessment (50% of the understated tax) was linked to three factors: the conclusion that the property was held in the course of an adventure in the nature of trade; the assertion that the taxpayer never lived in the property; and the magnitude of unreported income. All three of these assertions were incorrect. The taxpayer’s belief that she could navigate the tax laws related to personally held real property was incorrect; however, it was not tantamount to a deliberate act demonstrating indifference to compliance with the law. The gross negligence penalties were therefore reversed.

ACTION ITEM: Ensure to report all dispositions of real property, whether it is eligible for the principal residence exemption or not, on your personal tax return.

SAUNA AND HYDROTHERAPY POOL: Medical Expense Tax Credit

In a December 4, 2018 Technical Interpretation, CRA was asked whether the costs of installing a steam shower (sauna) and hydrotherapy pool could be eligible for the medical expense tax credit (METC). The use of these devices was recommended as treatment to maintain strength and mobility.

CRA noted that, for renovations to be eligible, they must:

  1. enable the patient to gain access to the dwelling or be mobile and functional within it;
  2. not typically be expected to increase the value of the dwelling; and
  3. not normally be undertaken by individuals with normal physical development or who do not have a severe and prolonged mobility impairment.

While the expenses contemplated may meet criteria (a), CRA opined they would likely fail criteria (b) and (c) and, therefore, not be eligible for the METC. However, eligibility remains a question of fact, with the onus on the taxpayer to demonstrate that all requirements were met.

Also, CRA noted that a renovation cost incurred for the main purpose of enabling a qualifying individual to gain access to the dwelling or be mobile and functional within it (the same as criteria (a) for the METC) could be eligible for the home accessibility tax credit (HATC). The HATC is a non-refundable credit that provides tax relief on up to $10,000 annually of renovations to a home to enhance mobility or reduce risk of harm for a qualifying individual (those 65 years of age or older at the end of the taxation year or eligible for the disability tax credit). The HATC requirements do not exclude costs failing criteria (b) or (c) above.

ACTION ITEM: There are several renovations that can be eligible for one or both of these credits. Receipts, invoices and/or other supporting documents should clearly identify the health benefits and purpose.

Contact one of our Taxation team members for more tax tips and advice.