Non-Profit Organization: Maintaining its Status

An August 30, 2023, Technical Interpretation discussed whether an entity could maintain its status as a non-taxable non-profit organization when investing in a subsidiary. NPOs need to maintain their status, as NPOs are exempt from tax on their income.

CRA stated that to maintain NPO status, the organization must be operated exclusively for purposes other than to earn profit. While an organization can have many purposes, none of them can be to earn a profit.

Incorporating and holding shares of a taxable subsidiary will not in and of itself cause the organization to lose its status. Earning incidental profit from activities directly connected to the non-profit objectives does not constitute a profit purpose. However, where the profit is not incidental or does not arise from non-profit objectivities, the entity will be considered to have a profit purpose even if the income is used to further the non-profit activities. This could be the case where long-term investments in shares of a corporation are held as the purpose would be to derive income from property.

CRA noted that, in general, an organization’s investment in a taxable corporation will indicate a profit purpose where the following conditions are met:

  • the taxable corporation’s activities are not connected to the organization’s objectives;
  • the organization does not have control of the corporation;
  • the organization holds fixed value preferred shares of the corporation; or
  • other shareholders have invested in the corporation to earn a profit.

If involved in an NPO, ensure that the organization’s assets and activities do not taint their NPO status.

Unlocking the Value: Understanding Intangible Assets in Business Valuation

Introduction:

When an acquiror obtains control of a business, both the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 3 Business Combination and Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE) Section 1582 require a fair value measurement for assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Unraveling the layers of intangible assets becomes pivotal, and the purchaser’s motivation sheds light on identifying and determining the significance of the intangible assets acquired.

This is the first of a series of articles on intangible assets and the various valuation methodologies and considerations.

The focus of this article is an overview and discussion of the five categories of identified intangible assets and the difference between fair value and fair market value, exploring the characteristics and considerations that play a key role in a valuation.

Five Categories of Identifiable Intangible Assets:

There are five distinctive categories of identifiable intangible assets, encompassing a range of elements vital to business operations. These include, but are not limited to the following:

  1. Marketing-related: Trademarks, trade names, and non-compete agreements.
  2. Customer-related: Customer lists, customer relationships, and customer contracts.
  3. Contract-based: Licensing, supply agreements, royalty agreements, and lease agreements.
  4. Technology-based: Computer software, databases, and trade secrets/formulations.
  5. Artistic-related: Books, scripts, music, and movies.
Fair Value vs. Fair Market Value

IFRS 3 requires intangible assets to be valued using IFRS 13’s definition of fair value: “as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.”

ASPE 1582 requires intangibles assets valued in a business combination to use the following definition of fair value: “the amount of the consideration that would be agreed upon in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties who are under no compulsion to act.”

In Canada, the definition of fair market value in business valuations is generally defined as: “the highest price, expressed in terms of cash equivalents, at which property would change hands between a hypothetical willing and able buyer and a hypothetical willing and able seller, acting at arm’s length in an open and unrestricted market, when neither is under compulsion to buy or sell when both have reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts.”

While the definitions are similar, they are not identical and may lead to a difference in assumptions and have an overall impact to the valuation conclusion.

Navigating the intricacies of business combinations and the valuation of intangible assets requires expertise and precision. For inquiries or assistance in this domain, our Financial Services Advisory Team (FSAT) is ready to guide you through the valuation process and provide assistance. Your understanding of these intangible assets is the key to unlocking the true value embedded in your business.

Life Insurance: Do I Really Need it?

This is a question I’ve been asked hundreds of times over the years and the answer is: it depends!

Everyone’s situation is unique and the only way to really know if you need life insurance is to complete a Comprehensive Life Insurance Needs Analysis with a licensed insurance professional or a Certified Financial Planner. A proper analysis for personal insurance should take into account the following details:

Financial Liabilities
  • Mortgage, loans, or other debts
  • Funeral expenses
  • Legal & accounting fees
  • Taxes
  • Education fund
  • Emergency fund
Need for Income Replacement
  • Amount
  • Length of time required
  • CPP benefits
Assets
  • Savings
  • Investments
  • Real estate
  • Life insurance (personal, group, mortgage, credit)
  • Business/farm assets
  • Government benefits
  • Other assets (vehicles, coin collections, etc.)

In addition to personal protection, some people purchase life insurance to accumulate wealth or to create or enhance their wealth for their family. As an example, Sue and Gord, both age 55, plan to leave $200,000 of their current wealth to their family. If they were to allocate their current savings into a life insurance plan, they could potentially increase the inheritance to their children from $500,000 at death to more than $775,000, assuming they both live to age 90. Others use life insurance to provide a significant donation to their favourite charity.

In addition to personal insurance needs, business owners have other areas of concern for which life insurance may provide the best solution. While insuring debts is important, businesses often use life insurance to fund shareholder or buy/sell agreements to ensure that funds are available when they are needed without having to leverage the business at a time when it’s lost a key stakeholder. It also protects the remaining business owner(s) from being forced into a partnership with the heirs of their recently deceased partner and provides guaranteed funds to the family to ensure a fair and timely settlement after the loss of their loved one.

Imagine that Jen and Berry enter into a business deal, starting with nothing more than a sweet idea and a few start-up dollars, then become successful beyond either of their imaginations! They have each developed a different expertise in the management of their business and have agreed to reinvest the bulk of their profits back into their enterprise to continually expand their growing empire. Jen has become the product developer and professional tester, creating products craved by millions, while Berry is the consummate marketer, getting their product on the shelves of thousands of retailers. Each partner knows that they would not be as successful without the expertise and hard work of the other and that neither would be easy to replace. Jen and Berry work with their accountant to determine a formula for calculating the fair value of their business, should either partner predecease the other. They agree that the remaining partner will pay the deceased partner’s family a fair value for the business and do so in a timely manner at the same time that both agree that their estates will be bound to sell the deceased shareholder’s interest in the business to the surviving shareholder at a fair price. Neither partner relishes the idea of selling their creation to fund the buyout of the deceased partner’s shares and are not sure about borrowing the funds, given that there may be a great deal of upheaval at the loss of either critical partner. Jen and Berry meet with their Certified Financial Planner and discuss their concerns. Their planner connects them with an insurance professional who works with them and their team of professionals to find a life insurance contract that works best in their situation. Now Jen and Berry can get back to what they enjoy doing most and not have to worry about the future of their business or family.

For some businesses, it might be important to insure a ‘key person’. As an example, I was once referred to a client to insure the owner of the business, only to find out in discussion with the owner that he was really not the ‘key person’. He had a salesperson who was responsible for 80% of the business revenue and in our discussions, the owner recognized the significant loss of revenue if he lost this ‘key person’ due to disability or death. Some business owners use life insurance to shelter capital being held in the business owner’s holding company to protect the hard-earned money from significant income tax on the growth and provide a tax-preferred method for the eventual distribution of the proceeds out of the holding company to the beneficiaries. An insurance contract can also cover the cost of capital gains tax or, similar to how it might be used personally, it could be used to enhance the value of the estate for the next generation or as a tax-preferred retirement fund.

Not every person, family, or business needs life insurance, but if you think you might, talk to an insurance professional. If you don’t have an insurance advisor, speak with your other trusted advisors, such as your Certified Financial Planner, Accountant, or Lawyer and ask for a referral to someone they trust. Interview the person and only agree to hire them if you’re comfortable with their competency in dealing with your unique situation. Only agree to engage them as your trusted insurance professional if they agree to work with the other members of your Professional Advisory Team.

Consequences of Emigration of a Canadian Taxpayer

In a more globalized world, and especially after the COVID-19 pandemic brought about a seismic shift in our workplaces and the adoption of remote work, emigration has become a more popular option for many taxpayers in the past few years. Emigration also represents the “final departure from Canada” of a taxpayer, and potentially the final opportunity for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to tax a taxpayer, which can therefore mean large tax liabilities. The purpose of this article is to explore some of the more common consequences of emigration of a Canadian taxpayer.

Determination of Residency

Any discussion of emigration pivots around the concept of residency in Canada. In Canada, the Income Tax Act (ITA) taxes Canadian residents on their worldwide income, and non-residents on their Canadian-sourced income.

Per CRA policies and technical bulletins, the most important determinants of residency are significant residential ties, or what are colloquially referred to as the “house and spouse” ties. These ties include whether you keep a dwelling place in Canada available for occupation by you, and whether your spouse or common-law partner, or other dependents, continue to be in Canada (or in a separate country).

After the significant residential ties are assessed, secondary residential ties are then assessed – these include personal property such as cars, furniture, and clothing, any economic ties (like a job or investment accounts), or insurance coverage in Canada.

It should be noted from the above that citizenship does not equal residency – a taxpayer can be a citizen of Canada but not a resident of Canada for tax purposes.

If a taxpayer leaves Canada, and they are determined to have “severed ties” with Canada, they are determined to have ceased residency on that date, i.e. emigrated from Canada.

Consequences of Ceasing Residency

If a taxpayer ceases residency in the year, they will be deemed to have disposed of certain types of capital property, the gain on which will trigger “departure tax”. Under the ITA, any securities, cryptocurrencies, or other investments held will be deemed to be disposed of at their fair market value, , potentially creating a large tax liability.. Notably, Canadian real estate is excluded from this rule.

If the taxpayer holds an RRSP, TFSA, or RRIF, these accounts will be excluded from the deemed disposition. Any withdrawals are likely to be taxed as passive income and subject to the withholding tax requirements discussed below. However, it is important to note that the other country in which the taxpayer is now resident may not recognize the RRSP or TFSA as a tax deferring vehicle, and thus tax any income earned in the plan.

Non-residents earning income in Canada

Employment or self-employment income earned in Canada as a non-resident will be subject to Part 1 tax in Canada, and a regular T1 income tax return is required to be filed.

If passive income, such as dividends, interest, or royalties, is received by a non-resident, such income will be subject to a 25% withholding tax that will be withheld and remitted to the CRA at source.  The withholding rate could be lower than 25% for residents from certain countries having tax treaties with Canada.

RRSP, RRIF, OAS, and other pension payments are also subject to a 25% withholding tax. However, an election is available to a non-resident to file a tax return with the CRA and report the income as if they were a Canadian resident, claiming certain tax credits, and enjoying lower tax brackets.

Income from a rental property is usually subject to the 25% withholding tax as well. However, an election is available for a non-resident to file a tax return with the CRA and report the income as if they were a Canadian resident, claiming rental expenses and certain tax credits, and enjoying lower tax brackets.

Note that the election to file a return does not eliminate the requirement of withholding tax at source.

If a non-resident owns a piece of Canadian real estate, or other “taxable Canadian property”, prior to or upon disposition, 25% of the net gain must be remitted to the government and a Request for a Clearance Certificate, T2062, must be filed with the CRA. Tax returns are available to be filed to receive a partial refund of this.  Of note, the government has introduced legislation to increase this withholding tax to 35% effective January 1, 2025.

Other tax considerations

There are certain provisions of the ITA that only apply to Canadian residents.  Three notable instances of this are:

  1. Capital Gains Exemption with regards to a share sale, which requires that the shares in question be held by a Canadian resident throughout the year.
  2. The definition of a Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation states that a corporation must not be controlled by a non-resident.
  3. The emigration of a trustee/beneficiary and their subsequent non-resident status has an impact on the taxation of a Trust.

Absent proper planning, running afoul of these rules can yield a significant unplanned tax liability.

Finally, as a non-resident, a taxpayer may still have social, employment, or tourism-related desires to return to Canada. Under the ITA, a non-resident who is temporarily staying (“sojourning”) in Canada for 183 days or more in a calendar year will be considered a deemed resident of Canada for the entire year. As discussed above, a resident of Canada will be taxed on their worldwide income, which can yield a significant tax liability.

Conclusion

Determining residency can be a complex endeavour, and dealing with the consequences of a change in residency can be overwhelming. Our experienced advisors at DJB are well versed in international and domestic tax and can gladly assist you with the development of an exit plan, advise on the consequences of moving, or can help advise you on any other issues that can arise with regards to emigration.

Motor Vehicle Allowances: Carpooling

Reasonable motor vehicle allowances received by employees in the course of employment duties are non-taxable. An allowance is not reasonable (and therefore taxable) if any of the following are met:

  • the allowance is not based solely on the number of kilometres driven for employment purposes;
  • the employee is reimbursed in whole or part for expenses in respect of that use; or
  • the per-km amount is not reasonable.

A November 23, 2023, French Technical Interpretation considered the tax implications of an employer increasing the motor vehicle allowance paid to its employees by an additional per kilometre amount for each person accompanying the driver. CRA opined that the two parts of the allowance (base and additional amount per passenger) constituted a single allowance since both were intended for the same use of the vehicle. They then opined that as the allowance provided was not solely based on the number of kilometres travelled to perform the duties of employment, the entire allowance was taxable.

Ensure that allowances paid to employees meet the strict conditions for being tax-free to avoid a surprise tax bill for the recipient.

Short-Term Rentals: Denial of Expenses

In late 2023, the Federal government announced its intention to deny income tax deductions for expenses by non-compliant operators of short-term rental properties (such as Airbnb or VRBO properties rented for periods of less than 90 days). These rules would apply to individuals, corporations, and trusts with non-compliant short-term rentals. These rules are proposed to come into effect on January 1, 2024.

A short-term rental would be noncompliant if, at any time, either:

  • the province or municipality does not permit the short-term rental operation at the location of the residential property; or
  • the short-term rental operation is not compliant with all applicable registration, licensing, and permit requirements.

Many municipalities require a business license or permit for short-term rental operations. Where short-term rental activities are carried on without such a permit, the operator would be subject to these proposals and taxable on gross rental revenues with no deductions in 2024 and later years.

Residential property would include a house, apartment, condominium unit, cottage, mobile home, trailer, houseboat, and any other property legally permitted to be used for residential purposes.

No expenses incurred with respect to the non-compliant short-term rental would be deductible. For example, consider a short-term rental that incurred $100,000 in expenses to generate $20,000 in profit. If non-compliant, all expenses would be denied, resulting in a profit for tax purposes of $120,000. Assuming the individual owner was in the top tax bracket (53.53% in Ontario), they would pay tax of $64,236. As the actual profit was only $20,000, the effective tax rate would be 321% ($64,236/$20,000). In absolute dollars, the individual would have to pay $53,530 in additional taxes due to the denied expenses.

Where the short-term rental was non-compliant for part of the year and compliant for another part of the year, the total expenses incurred for all short-term rental activity would be pro-rated over the period of that activity to determine the nondeductible portion.
For example, assume that a property was used for long-term rental from January 1 to June 30, then converted to short-term rental on July 1. However, the owner did not obtain a business permit as required until September 1 (62 days non-compliant). Expenses for July 1 to December 31 (the short-term rental period, 184 days) would be 62/184 non-deductible. Expenses related to the long-term rental period would not be part of the calculation of non-deductible expenses.

Transitional rule

For the 2024 taxation year, if the taxpayer is compliant with all applicable registration, licensing, and permit requirements on December 31, 2024, they would be deemed compliant for the entire 2024 year and, as such, would be able to deduct all relevant expenses for 2024.

Ensure you comply with all municipal and provincial rules by December 31, 2024, to retain all deductions applicable to your short-term rental for the year.

GST/HST Returns: Mandatory Electronic Filing

For reporting periods that begin in 2024 and onwards, GST/HST registrants (except charities and selected financial institutions) must file all GST/HST returns with CRA electronically. Registrants who file their GST/HST returns on paper are subject to a penalty of $100 for the first offense and $250 for each subsequent return not filed electronically. While CRA waived these penalties for monthly and quarterly filers who failed to file returns electronically for periods beginning before March 31, 2024, the relief will end shortly.

Ensure that GST/HST returns are properly filed electronically to avoid these penalties.

Normalizing Earnings or Cash Flow

Businesses with active operations are commonly valued based on their ability to generate earnings or cash flow. For mature businesses that demonstrate consistent earnings or cash flow, a Chartered Business Valuator (CBV) or other valuation practitioner may employ a capitalized earnings or cash flow methodology to assess the value of the business operations if future results are expected to be stable. Under this type of methodology, historical business results are analyzed to estimate a sustainable level of earnings or cash flow. A capitalization rate or multiple is then applied to determine the hypothetical amount an investor would pay for the business operations.

In order to determine the sustainable level of earnings or cash flow a business can generate, historical results are reviewed. Adjustments are made to the reported results to arrive at “normalized” earnings or cash flow, which are then considered when selecting the sustainable level or range. Below are some examples of common normalizing adjustments made to determine a business’s normalized earnings or cash flow:

Related Party Transactions

Businesses often have transactions with related individuals (such as shareholders or their family members) and companies controlled by these individuals. These transactions may involve discretionary payments or do not always reflect the economic value transferred. When normalizing earnings or cash flow, these transactions are typically adjusted to market rates that would be paid or received from an arm’s-length (unrelated) party. Examples include compensation paid to owners or their family members working in the business, rent for real estate or equipment owned by a related individual or corporation, sales or purchases with related entities, and consulting or management fees. These can be in the normal course of business, but they may sometimes be for other purposes such as tax planning.

Redundant Asset Adjustments

Businesses may own redundant assets — assets not used in active operations. Under an income approach, the value of redundant assets is considered separately from the value of business operations to avoid double counting. Income or expenses related to these redundant assets are removed from normalized earnings. Examples include dividend or interest income from marketable securities and loans, investment management fees, and life insurance premiums. If a business owns real estate not essential for operations, treating it as a redundant asset involves adjusting earnings by adding back ownership costs and deducting a “market” rental rate.

Non-Recurring and Non-Operating Adjustments

Non-recurring items are amounts that are not expected to occur in the future on a predictable basis. Examples of non-recurring items include lawsuit settlements, moving costs, discontinued operations, and revenue from one-time projects. These nonrecurring revenues and expenses are removed from normalized earnings/ cash flow. Non-operating expenses are also removed and include personal expenses paid by a business on behalf of a shareholder.

Selecting a Maintainable Level:

There is no precise method or formula to determine the maintainable earnings of a business. Normalized historical results are one factor among others considered when estimating the maintainable future earnings for valuing business operations. Other factors include short-term budgets/forecasts, industry and economic data, management input on the future business outlook, and the professional judgment of the valuation practitioner.

If you have any questions regarding your business’s earnings or cash flow, please contact a member of our Financial Services Advisory Team (FSAT) team.

 

Farm Losses can be Restricted: May Apply Even When Significant Time and Cash is Invested

A November 8, 2023, Tax Court of Canada case considered whether a taxpayer’s losses from farming activities deductible against non-farming income were restricted to the $17,500 ($2,500 plus half of the next $30,000) permitted by the restricted farm loss rules for the 2014 and 2015 years. The restriction applies where the taxpayer’s chief source of income for a taxation year is neither farming nor a combination of farming and some other source of income that is a subordinate source of income for the taxpayer.

The taxpayer was a physician but also operated a farm that produced organic beef. The taxpayer provided the following relevant details. (See chart below.)

  Medical Practice Farming
Gross Revenue $805,321 – 2014

$851,621 – 2015

$174,433 – 2014

$31,128 – 2015

Net Income (loss $648, 480 – 2014 $697,050 – 2015 ($530,363) – 2014 ($595,904) – 2015
Staff Employed Three part-time employees Four full-time employees and three seasonal part-time employees
Taxpayers’ Work Schedule Commenced work on weekdays between 7 am and 9 am and ended between 2 pm to 5 pm Five hours/day on weekdays (before and after performing physician duties) and 8-16 hours/day on the weekends
Hours Worked by Taxpayer (approx.) 1,900 hours/year 2,500 hours/year
Capital Investment There were no significant assets. The operating facilities were rented for $250/year from the municipality, likely as an incentive to maintain a local physician. The operation included over 800 head of cattle, 5,314 acres of land, three large shelter and storage buildings, a building for processing meat, two more buildings under construction, and various pieces of equipment such as tractors, trucks, and haying equipment.
History The taxpayer commenced a continually profitable practice as a physician in 1975. The farming operation commenced shortly after 1975. Various different crops/ products were attempted. Losses were reported in all years but two.
Taxpayer loses

The Court noted that the taxpayer’s farm activities took place before and after normal working hours and gave way to her medical practice if an issue arose that required her attention. As such, the Court found that the centre of the taxpayer’s routine was her medical practice. Further, the Court noted that the farm was only commenced after the medical practice and that all of the investment in the farm came from the medical practice. The farm required the cash inflow of the medical practice to survive. The farming business had always been subordinate to the medical practice as a source of income, rather than the other way around, and there was no demonstration that this would change in the foreseeable future. As such, the Court determined that the restricted farm loss rules would apply and the taxpayer’s deduction would be limited to $17,500.

Court’s additional commentary

The Court noted that the result was most unfortunate as it resulted in the denial of a loss for a bona fide farming business that would have been available to the operator of any other business. In particular, the Court noted how this case demonstrated the difficulty in growing a viable farming business with the current restricted farm loss rule punishing those willing to put in the significant time and capital required to do so.

ACTION: If farming activities consume a significant portion of your resources but you earn income from other significant sources as well, seek consultation to determine if farming losses may be restricted.

Personal Services Business (PSB): CRA Education Initiative

In general, a personal services business (PSB) exists where the individual performing the work would be considered to be an employee of the payer if it were not for the existence of the individual’s corporation. These workers are often referred to as incorporated employees. Where it is determined that the income is earned from a PSB, the corporate tax rate increases significantly (potentially as high as 39% over the small business rate, depending on the province). In addition, significantly fewer expenditures are deductible against the income.

Since 2022, CRA has been conducting an educational pilot project in respect of PSBs. They have recently published findings from the project and highlighted future planned phases.

Phase I – Identifying companies that hire PSBs

Phase I of the project was conducted from June to December 2022. The results were as follows:

  • approximately 10% of participating corporations were likely to be carrying on PSBs;
  • approximately 64% of potential PSBs were incorrectly claiming the small business deduction (an average of $16,711 of additional federal corporate tax would be payable if this were corrected);
  • nearly 74% of potential PSBs work in the following three industries:
    • transportation and warehousing (35%), with 95% of these working in freight trucking;
    • professional, scientific and technical services (26%); and
    • construction (13%).
Phase II – Identifying potential PSBs

CRA indicated that Phase II is planned for October 2023 to June 2024, and will examine approximately 2,100 randomly selected corporations identified as potential PSBs. The examination will include a voluntary interview and focus on the 2022 tax year. CRA indicated that they hope to gain greater insight into how and why PSBs operate the way they do.

Phase III – Assisted compliance for PSBs

CRA indicated that the timing of Phase III has not yet been determined. They expect to address the 2022 and subsequent tax years with continued education, review of PSBs and assisted compliance of non-compliant PSBs.

ACTION ITEM: Identification of PSBs has become a focal point for CRA. If there is a risk of your corporation carrying on a PSB, inquire as to the corporation’s exposure and potential mitigation strategies.