Tax Considerations for Canadian Snowbirds

Canada is known for its long and frigid winters. Many Canadians, often referred to as snowbirds travel south to the USA to escape the freezing Canadian temperatures, taking extended vacations to enjoy the year-round warmth that parts of the United States have to offer. These so-called snowbirds should carefully plan their stays in the USA, however, since a stay exceeding a specific number of days might have unintended Canadian and US income tax consequences.
 
Canadian income tax consequences for snowbirds

Snowbirds should continue to file their Canadian tax return, as usual, reporting any worldwide income earned in the year on their T1 income tax and benefit return, whether received from inside or outside of Canada. Similarly, they should claim all the applicable deductions and credits and pay the federal and provincial or territorial taxes based on their residential ties. This generally means that any income earned by the snowbirds from the USA should be reported in their T1 return. However, to avoid double taxation, they will be able to claim a credit for the amount of any US tax paid by them, thereby reducing their Canadian tax liabilities.

US income tax consequences for snowbirds

On spending a significant amount of time in the USA, snowbirds might not realize that they may be subject to US income tax obligations by becoming, in effect, US residents as per the US tax residency rules. For US tax purposes, the residential status of a snowbird is determined under either of the US domestic tax rules for residency below. If they meet either of these tests, they will be considered a US resident and will need to comply with US income tax laws.

  1. Physically present in the USA in the current calendar year for more than 183 days
  2. Substantial presence test (SPT)

Snowbirds who are in the USA for less than 183 days in the current year can still be treated as US residents for tax purposes if they meet the SPT.

The SPT would be met if they are physically present in the USA for at least:

  • 31 days during the current year; and
  • A total of 183 days during the three-year period that includes the current and the immediately preceding two years, counting:
    • All the days they were present in the USA in the current year, and
    • One-third of the days they were present in the USA in the first year before the current year, and
    • One-sixth of the days they were present in the USA in the second year before the current year.

It is worth noting that for the SPT, a day generally includes any part of the day spent in the USA unless the individual is in transit through the USA. Furthermore, the purpose of the stay in the USA does not affect the SPT.

There are certain exceptions from the tests above that exempt snowbirds from being treated as US residents for tax purposes. These are discussed below.

1.    Canada–US income tax treaty “tie-breaker” provision – greater than 183 days

The tie-breaker rule in the income tax treaty between Canada and the USA  allows a taxpayer treated as a tax resident of both the USA and Canada under their domestic tax rules to only be treated as a resident of the country to which they have stronger ties to. Essentially, this rule will allow the taxpayer to remain a resident of one country as opposed to two. 

To be exempt under the treaty, snowbirds must demonstrate that they have stronger ties with Canada than the USA, including a permanent home, social/economic ties, habitual abode, and citizenship. In addition, they must file Form 1040NR along with a fully completed Form 8833 (treaty-based return position disclosure) explaining why they should be considered a resident of Canada and not a resident of the USA. The filing due date of both the forms—Form 1040NR and Form 8833—is June 15 of each year.

2.    Closer connection exception—SPT

Even after meeting the requirements of the SPT in a given year, snowbirds may still be able to avoid being considered US residents using the closer connection exception. Under this exception, snowbirds need to demonstrate:

  • A “closer connection” to Canada, and 
  • That they were in the USA for less than 183 days in the year.

To claim this exception, snowbirds must first establish that they maintained more significant residential ties with Canada than with the USA. A closer connection generally exists if their social and economic ties (such as the location of a permanent home; family connections; personal belongings; business and banking ties; and social, political, cultural, or religious affiliations, etc.) remain closer to Canada. Secondly, they have to stay in the USA for less than 183 days during the year for which the exception is claimed. On satisfying both these conditions, snowbirds can fall under the closer connection exception.

In addition, they must file a US Form 8840 (closer connection exception statement for aliens) for each year for which the SPT is met, and the closer connection exception is claimed. Similar to Forms 1040NR and 8833, the filing deadline for Form 8840 is June 15 of the year following the end of the relevant tax year unless the filing date falls on a weekend or a holiday. Filing the form will allow them to maintain their tax status as a non-resident of the USA under US tax law.

Snowbirds owning US real property

Snowbirds owning US real estate property might be liable for US income tax regardless of whether they are treated as a US resident for tax purposes. While owning and using US real estate property only for personal purposes might require them to report the property on their T1 return, they do not have any US annual filing obligations with regard to that property. However, renting the US property for more than 15 days during the year or the eventual sale of the property may trigger US tax and filing obligations. 

Snowbirds renting out their homes in the USA for more than 15 days during the year and earning rental income from investment properties are usually subject to a 30%  US non-resident withholding rate which satisfies their US tax requirements. However, snowbirds can make an election to be taxed on net rental income (after taking into consideration certain expenses related to the rental income) at graduated tax rates applicable to the individual which can be more beneficial and reduce the tax liability. However, to elect to file on a net rental basis, the taxpayer will need to complete Form W-8ECI to avoid the 30% withholding tax. The form applies to a foreign national who is the beneficial owner of the US source income that is (or is deemed to be) effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the USA.

If the election is filed, the snowbird will be required to file a US tax return (Form 1040NR) to report the net rental income.

The taxpayer will require a US tax identification number to make this election and to file the US return.

Similarly, the sale of a US property would be subject to a 15% US non-resident withholding rate on the gross sale price at the closing date. However, the snowbird can file a waiver to have this withholding based on the net capital gain (if any) and/or claim a possible exemption. The snowbird would then report the net capital gain realized from the sale on a US tax return and claim any withholding as an instalment toward their final liability.

Since US net rental income or US net capital gain would also have to be reported on their Canadian tax return, the snowbird can claim any US tax paid on their US return as a credit on their Canadian return to reduce their Canadian tax and avoid double taxation.

Key takeaways

While an extended vacation to warmer locales may be an excellent way to beat the Canadian winter blues, travellers must keep abreast of any US tax reporting obligations they may be subject to. Keeping track of the number of days spent in the USA is an important first step for all snowbirds. Staying under the 183-day threshold may help snowbirds avoid any unintended tax consequences.




This article was written by Frank Casciaro, Chetna Thapar, Danielle Wallace and originally appeared on 2022-07-28 RSM Canada, and is available online at https://rsmcanada.com/insights/services/business-tax-insights/tax-considerations-for-canadian-snowbirds.html.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.

DJB is a proud member of RSM Canada Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms across North America. RSM Canada Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM Canada LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the Canadian member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM Canada Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how DJB can assist you, please contact us.

Bill C-47: International Tax Amendments

This article, authored by RSM Canada, highlights the international aspects of the recent amendments to Bill C-47 in Canada’s Income Tax Act.

The article covers the expansion of withholding tax obligations for non-residents, the narrowing of the money lending business exception, and the introduction of a new functional currency and broader stop-loss provision.

The aforementioned changes have compliance implications for companies that conduct business across borders. 

US Citizens Living Abroad can Become Compliant with Their US Tax Obligations Relatively Unscathed by Using the Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedure

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has acknowledged that there are many US taxpayers outside of the USA who are non-compliant with their US tax filings including Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs) and, as such, are offering special procedures for US taxpayers to become compliant.

The Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedure allows delinquent U.S. taxpayers the opportunity to come forward and avoids possible IRS enforcement action and the large penalties associated with not filing.

The streamlined filing compliance procedures are available to taxpayers certifying that their failure to report foreign financial assets and pay all tax due in respect of those assets did not result from willful conduct on their part. The streamlined procedures are designed to provide to taxpayers in such situations with:

  • a streamlined procedure for filing amended or delinquent returns, and
  • terms for resolving their tax and penalty procedure for filing amended or delinquent returns, and
  • terms for resolving their tax and penalty obligations.

The streamlined procedures are available to both US individual taxpayers residing outside the USA and US individual taxpayers residing in the USA.  For the purposes of this article, we will focus on US taxpayer’s living outside of the USA.

For purposes of the streamlined procedures, US citizens and lawful permanent residents, i.e., green card holders, are nonresidents if, in one or more of the most recent three years for which the US tax return due date has passed, they (1) did not have an abode in the United States and (2) were physically outside the United States for at least 330 full days.

US taxpayers eligible to use the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures must (1) for each of the most recent 3 years for which the U.S. tax return due date has passed, file delinquent or amended tax returns, together with all required information returns (e.g., Forms 3520, 5471, and 8938) and (2) for each of the most recent 6 years for which the FBAR due date has passed, file any delinquent FBARs (FinCEN Form 114, previously Form TD F 90-22.1). The full amount of the tax and interest due in connection with these filings must be remitted with the delinquent or amended returns.

A US taxpayer filing under the streamlined procedure must certify that:
  1. they are eligible for the Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures;
  2. all required FBARs have now been filed; and
  3. failure to file tax returns, report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, resulted from non-willful conduct.

A taxpayer who is eligible to use these Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures and who complies with all of the instructions outlined by the IRS will not be subject to failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties, accuracy-related penalties, information return penalties, or FBAR penalties.

If returns are properly filed under these procedures and are subsequently selected for audit under existing audit selection processes, the taxpayer will not be subject to failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties or accuracy-related penalties with respect to amounts reported on those returns, or to information return penalties or FBAR penalties, unless the examination results in a determination that the original tax noncompliance was fraudulent and/or that the FBAR violation was willful.  As with any US tax return filed in the normal course, if the IRS determines an additional tax deficiency for a return submitted under these procedures, the IRS may assert applicable additions to tax and penalties relating to that additional deficiency.

If you need assistance in becoming compliant in the USA, we are well-seasoned in this matter and our cross border professionals can help you.

U.S. Tax Compliance for Canadians Who Own U.S. Real Property

U.S. Rental income

If a Canadian resident receives rental income from real property located in the U.S., they are subject to a non-resident withholding tax of 30% of the gross rental income, which is required to be remitted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) by the tenant. The 30% withholding tax cannot be reduced by way of the Canada – United States income tax convention.

Non-residents of the U.S. can also make an election to be taxed as if their rental income was effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. Furthermore, the taxpayer can deduct expenses engaged to earn rental income and then be taxed on the net income at graduated rates, rather than a 30% flat rate on the gross rent. To make this election and avoid the 30% withholding, a taxpayer must complete form W-8ECI and provide the form to the person who is paying the rent.

To deduct expenses in order to be taxed on your net income, a taxpayer must file a U.S. tax return as a non-resident (form 1040NR). The amount of the tax withheld will be reported on the 1040NR and will get refunded if there is excess tax withheld over the final income tax liability. The tax return must include a statement confirming that an election has been made. The election must include the address of the property, your percentage of ownership, description of improvements made, etc.

A taxpayer only has to make the election once and the election has to be made on each new property. The election will be valid for as long as a taxpayer owns a property and if their 1040NR is filed on time. To file a 1040NR, a taxpayer will need to obtain a U.S. Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) by completing a form W-7.

A taxpayer also has to report rental income in the state where the property is located.

Selling U.S. Real Property

If a Canadian resident sells real estate located in the United States, they are subject to a 10% or 15% withholding tax of the gross selling price under FIRPTA (Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act). If the property is sold for an amount greater than $300,000 but less than $1,000,000 and the property is being purchased with the intention of being used as the purchaser’s residence, then the sale will only be subject to a 10% withholding as opposed to the 15% rate. The tax withheld will be offset against the U.S. tax liability on any gain realized on the sale and will be refunded if it exceeds the tax liability.

There are two exceptions to the withholding requirement which can reduce or eliminate the requirement.

  • The first exception applies if the property is sold for less than $300,000 USD to a buyer who intends to occupy it as their principal residence. The gain on the sale is still taxable in the U.S. and a tax return (1040NR) must be filed.
  • The second exception is if a Canadian resident gets a withholding certificate from the IRS on the basis that the expected U.S. tax liability will be less than 10% or 15% of the selling price. The certificate will indicate the amount of tax that should be withheld by the purchaser rather than the full 10% or 15%. Ideally, the withholding certificate should be obtained from the IRS before the sale closes. To apply for a withholding certificate a Form 8288-B must be completed and sent to the IRS. A U.S. ITIN must be included on the Form 8288-B or can be applied for by way of a Form W-7 with the Form 8288-B. The IRS will generally issue a withholding certificate within 90 days of submission.

The gain or loss on the sale of a U.S. real property by a non-resident is required to be reported on a U.S. Non-Resident Income Tax Return (1040NR). As a Canadian tax resident the disposition of a U.S. property is required to be reported in Canada. If there is a gain on the sale, the U.S. has the right to tax the gain first and the U.S. tax liability can be claimed as a foreign tax credit against any Canadian and provincial tax on the sale.

Similarly, state income tax may apply on the sale depending on where the property is located.

Please contact your DJB accountant should you wish to discuss this further.

U.S. Federal Tax Consequences for Canadian Businesses with US Operations

Background

Canadian businesses continue to extend their reach into the U.S. for numerous reasons; some of which include proximity, lower corporate tax rates as a result of the 2017 US tax reform, a stable economy, and a skilled workforce. While these are all great reasons to expand operations into the U.S., companies must consider the U.S. Federal and State tax implications of carrying on a trade or business in the U.S. Note that this article does not cover U.S. state tax issues Canadian businesses may face – please contact us for further guidance on navigating such situations.

What does it mean to “carry on a trade or business in the U.S.”?

Generally, a trade or business is any activity conducted for the purpose of generating income. The threshold for this determination is fairly low in that a Canadian company could be considered to be carrying on a trade or business in the U.S. when it has considerable, regular, and continuous dealings with U.S. customers.

Effectively Connected Income and U.S. Permanent Establishments

Generally, when a Canadian company engages in a U.S. trade or business, all income associated with that trade or business is considered to be Effectively Connected Income (ECI). Note that U.S. source income may still be considered to be ECI even when there is no connection between the income and the U.S. trade or business.

Canadian companies are required to pay U.S. federal income tax on ECI (less expenses incurred to generate ECI) however, companies may seek relief from this tax burden pursuant to the U.S. – Canada income tax convention. Under the tax treaty, Canadian companies are only required to pay U.S. federal income tax if they carry on business through a U.S. permanent establishment.

Generally, a permanent establishment (PE) is defined as a fixed place of business in the U.S. through which a non-resident entity (i.e. a Canadian company) carries on business. This definition continues to evolve given the rise in e-commerce activities. Some traditional examples of a PE include:

  • A fixed place of business such as a branch, an office, factory, workshop, etc.
  • Agents who habitually exercise the authority to conclude binding contracts in the U.S. on behalf of the Canadian company.
  • The provision of services that meet certain specified criteria.

Pursuant to the tax treaty, the following activities generally do not give rise to a U.S. PE:

  • The use of facilities for storage, display or delivery of goods.
  • The maintenance of a stock of goods for storage, display, and or delivery.
  • The purchase of goods in the U.S.
  • Advertisement, supply of information or scientific research done in the U.S. that is preparatory or secondary to the business.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Filing Requirements

Canadian companies with income effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business must file U.S. federal income tax returns. A Canadian business with U.S. ECI that is not attributable to a U.S. PE must file U.S. Federal Form 1120-F US Income Tax Return of a Foreign Corporation and Form 8833 Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure Under Section 6114 or 7701(b) to claim relief from U.S. federal tax pursuant to the U.S.- Canada income tax treaty. Generally, this return must be filed 5 ½ months after the taxpayer’s year-end. For example, a calendar year taxpayer must file the protective return by June 15th.  

Canadian companies with U.S. ECI attributable to a U.S. PE cannot claim the treaty exemption and must file Form 1120-F to report U.S. source income and expenses. The taxpayer may claim foreign tax credits on its Canadian income tax return for any U.S. income tax paid. Generally, this return must be filed 3 ½ months after the taxpayer’s year-end. For example, a calendar year taxpayer must file the return by April 15th.

Penalties

If a return is filed late but no tax is payable due to the treaty exemption, interest and penalties may not apply if the return is filed by the second deadline which is 18 months from the original due date. If the return is not filed by the second deadline, the Canadian company may be taxed on its U.S. source gross business income. If a treaty exemption is claimed to eliminate the tax liability, a non-disclosure penalty of $10,000 may be levied for each item of income.

If a return is filed late and there is tax due, interest and penalties will be calculated based on the tax due and exposure can be quite significant

Summary

Canadian companies with activities in the U.S. may have federal income tax filing obligations and in some cases, a federal tax liability when business is conducted through a permanent establishment. Note that U.S. state income tax obligations may also apply based on the different laws of each state.

If you determine your business may have a U.S. income tax filing obligation or are thinking about expanding to the U.S., we can help. Our cross-border taxation advisors have the knowledge and expertise to help you evaluate and determine the implications for your business.

Canadian Residents Earning Income through Non-resident US LLCs

There are ample commentaries on the negative tax consequences faced by non-resident investors using a fiscally transparent US entity to carry on a business or to earn investment income in Canada, but what about Canadian-resident investors earning Canadian-sourced income through such entities? This structure is uncommon but occasionally useful for commercial reasons, and it results in negative Canadian withholding tax consequences. However, the Canadian withholding tax analysis is more favourable where the fiscally transparent entity is a partnership. US tax consequences are outside the scope of this article.

Consider a limited liability company (LLC) with US and Canadian shareholders that is not a corporation resident in Canada. Dividend income is received from a Canadian-resident corporation.

The CRA’s longstanding position is that an LLC is a corporation for Canadian tax purposes (even though it can be treated as a fiscally transparent entity for US tax purposes). The definition of “person” in subsection 248(1) includes a corporation, so the LLC is a person. The LLC is also a non-resident; therefore, the dividend payment by the Canadian-resident corporation triggers a 25 percent withholding tax under subsection 212(2). The issue is whether treaty relief is available for this tax in the scenario described above, specifically if amounts are allocated to Canadian shareholders.

Under article IV(1) of the Canada-US tax treaty, the LLC does not qualify as a US resident because, as a fiscally transparent entity for US purposes, it is not liable for US tax. According to this rule, the LLC itself would therefore not be eligible for treaty benefits.

The next step in the analysis is to consider article IV(6) of the treaty, which specifically addresses fiscally transparent entities. A US resident can meet all the conditions of this provision; therefore, if all other conditions are satisfied (for example, the limitation-on-benefits clause in article XXIX A), the withholding tax rate may go down to either 5 percent or 15 percent (pursuant to article X(2)). On the other hand, a Canadian resident could not meet the test in article IV(6) because, among other reasons, paragraph (b) of the provision requires that the entity be treated as fiscally transparent in Canada, which is not the case (see the CRA opinion noted above). As a result, the applicable withholding tax rate is not reduced below 25 percent in our example.

In summary, it appears that where the Canadian-source income is derived through a US-resident LLC, this look-through provision applies to its US-resident shareholders only and does not apply to grant benefits to non-US-resident shareholders. As a result, the dividend income in the example would be subject to 25 percent withholding tax, without treaty relief.

Where the fiscally transparent entity is a partnership, the situation generates different results. Paragraph 212(13.1)(b) of the ITA provides that where a Canadian-resident person pays an amount to a partnership other than a Canadian partnership, the partnership will be deemed to be a non-resident person for the purposes of part XIII; as a result, withholding tax will apply to all dividend recipients, whether they are Canadian residents or non-residents. A similar position is stated in paragraph 7 of Interpretation Bulletin IT-81R. However, the commentary in form NR 302 is generally more favourable: where a partnership has Canadian-resident and non-resident partners, withholding tax may not apply to the portion of the dividend allocated to the Canadian-resident partners, subject to certain qualifying conditions. Relying on the latter CRA position, no negative consequences for the Canadian residents should occur in the example where the fiscally transparent US entity is a partnership rather than an LLC.

This content originally published in the Canadian Tax Foundations newsletter: Canadian Tax Focus. Republished with permission.


This article was written by Nakul Kohli, Clara Pham and originally appeared on 2022-08-19 RSM Canada.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.

DJB is a proud member of RSM Canada Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms across North America. RSM Canada Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM Canada LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the Canadian member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM Canada Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how DJB can assist you, please contact us.

Home Office and Permanent Establishment for Non-resident Corporations

Executive summary 

Home office(s) in Canada may constitute a permanent establishment of the non-resident corporation in Canada if the employer requires the employees to work from home.

Non-resident corporations may be subject to tax in Canada if they carry on business in Canada. Most of Canada’s tax treaties with its major trading partners require the higher-threshold presence of a permanent establishment in Canada to be satisfied before a non-resident is subject to Canadian tax. 

A permanent establishment is generally a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on. In general, a permanent establishment requires the existence of three conditions:

1. A place of business, whether owned or rented, so long as the enterprise has the legal right to use the place of business,

2. The place of business must have a degree of permanence and,

3. The business must be carried on wholly or partly through the fixed place of business.

The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Model Tax Convention defines a permanent establishment as “a fixed place of business in which a business is wholly or partly carried on, including a place of management, a branch, or an office, a factory, a workshop, a mine and etc.” Further, a person acting in Canada on behalf of a non-resident, other than an agent of an independent status, can be deemed to have a permanent establishment in Canada if such person has, and habitually exercises in Canada, an authority to conclude contracts in the name of the non-resident. Permanent establishment could also arise if the employee or agent has a stock of merchandise owned by the corporation from which they regularly fill orders received. 

Change in hiring policies during the COVID-19 period

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some foreign corporations may have hired senior management employees in Canada who decided to work from their home offices in Canada. Assuming these employees do not habitually exercise the authority to conclude contracts in the name of the non-resident, would their home offices constitute a fixed place of business in Canada, and therefore, a permanent establishment in Canada? 

Whether a home office constitutes a permanent establishment?

Whether a home office constitutes a permanent establishment of a non-resident corporation is largely dependent on whether the home office should be considered a place of business at the disposal of the non-resident corporation. In general, the ‘right of disposal’ means that the non-resident must have a right to use the space as the non-resident’s place of business and the mere presence of space is insufficient to conclude the determination of a permanent establishment.

Generally, the home offices of the Canadian-resident employees are likely not considered permanent establishments if they are not referred to as the non-resident corporation’s Canadian address on their website, business cards, or any advertisement. Further, to the extent the non-resident corporation does not bear home office expenses, does not stipulate what the home offices may contain, and Canadian employees do not have access to each other’s homes to perform their official functions, the home offices may not be considered the permanent establishment of the non-resident corporation.

Despite these conditions, the OECD provides that a home office may still constitute a permanent establishment if used on a continuous basis for carrying on business activities for a company and it is clear from the facts and circumstances that the company has required the individual to use that location to carry on the company’s business (e.g., by not providing an office to an employee in circumstances where the nature of the employment clearly requires an office). Alternatively, if the carrying of business activities at the home of an individual (under most circumstances, employee) is intermittent or incidental with interruptions, the home office is not likely to be considered to be a location at the disposal of the enterprise.

The OECD has also provided a few examples to illustrate situations where a home office is considered to be a permanent establishment of an enterprise. For example, if a non-resident consultant uses a home office in another country, in which she carries on most of her business activities from an office set up in her home, the home office could be considered a location at the disposal of the employer. On the other hand, a cross-frontier worker who completes most of her work at home in one country rather than in the office made available to her in another country would likely not be considered a permanent establishment, because the employer did not require that the home be used for its business activities. 

That is, if a non-resident corporation hires employees in Canada and requires them to work from their home office(s) in Canada, the home offices may constitute a permanent establishment of the non-resident corporation in Canada, resulting in tax obligations in Canada.

Some practical examples 

Non-resident corporations may not be considered to have a permanent establishment in Canada in the following situations:

1. Non-resident corporations do not bear any costs relating to the Canadian employees’ home offices in Canada;

2. Non-resident corporations do not use the Canadian employees’ home offices for any advertisement, business address, or on their website and,  

3. Non-resident corporations provide an office space or hoteling work arrangements in the non-resident corporation’s principal jurisdiction (e.g., the US) to conduct their official duties. The employees may choose to work from their home offices in Canada.

Corporations to review their employee’s locations and employment contracts to avoid creating conflicting taxable positions

The CRA in 2020 announced certain relief from pandemic-induced permanent establishments at the national level. However, there has been no further similar administrative relief related to the pandemic and instead, significant financial investment and measures have been introduced to bolster the CRA’s audit and enforcement powers. Non-resident corporations should review any permanent establishment exposures in light of lifting travel restrictions and increasingly mobile workforces.

 

This article was written by Nakul Kohli and originally appeared on 2022-08-01 RSM Canada, and is available online at https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2022/home-office-and-permanent-establishment-for-non-resident-corporations.html.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

RSM Canada Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM Canada Operations ULC, RSM Canada LLP and certain of their affiliates (“RSM Canada”). RSM Canada Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM Canada. RSM Canada LLP is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms. Members of RSM Canada Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM Canada but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmcanada.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International. The RSM trademark is used under license by RSM Canada. RSM Canada Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM Canada.

DJB is a proud member of RSM Canada Alliance, a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms across North America. RSM Canada Alliance provides our firm with access to resources of RSM, the leading provider of audit, tax and consulting services focused on the middle market. RSM Canada LLP is a licensed CPA firm and the Canadian member of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax and consulting firms with more than 43,000 people in over 120 countries.

Our membership in RSM Canada Alliance has elevated our capabilities in the marketplace, helping to differentiate our firm from the competition while allowing us to maintain our independence and entrepreneurial culture. We have access to a valuable peer network of like-sized firms as well as a broad range of tools, expertise, and technical resources.

For more information on how DJB can assist you, please contact us.

Payroll Considerations for Foreign Employees Working in Canada

Foreign employers should understand that sending even one employee to work in Canada will trigger a payroll obligation. Compliance starts from the first day of the foreign employee’s physical presence in Canada. It is the employer’s responsibility to set up the foreign employee on Canadian payroll and deduct the applicable Canadian income taxes and Canadian social security taxes (Canadian Pension Plan and Employment Insurance).

This article, written by RSM Canada, explains what foreign employers need to know about payroll obligations for employee(s) who are working in Canada.