Navigating Capital Gains: Compliance Updates and Tax Planning Strategies

Executive summary

Budget 2024 proposed an increase in the capital gains inclusion rate (CGIR) from 1/2 to 2/3. However, with the recent deferral to January 1, 2026, coupled with the slow-moving legislative process and upcoming federal elections, taxpayers face significant uncertainty. This makes proactive tax planning more essential than ever.

In response to this uncertainty, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has provided updates and relief measures for taxpayers, including maintaining specific reporting periods for capital gains, waiving late-filing penalties and interest until mid-2025, and extending deadlines for filing information returns.

Taxpayers should explore various strategies to navigate these changes, such as realizing gains early, leveraging exemptions, and adjusting investment strategies to optimize their tax position. Staying informed and adaptable is crucial as legislative developments unfold.

 
Navigating capital gains: Compliance updates and tax planning strategies

The proposed changes to the capital gains inclusion rate (CGIR) continue to create uncertainty for taxpayers and businesses alike. While the Department of Finance (DOF) has deferred the implementation of increased CGIR from 1/2 to 2/3 to Jan. 1, 2026, no further legislative updates have been introduced, leaving taxpayers in a position of ambiguity.

Current state of affairs

Since its announcement in the 2024 federal budget, the implementation of increased CGIR has been moving at a slow pace, leading to speculation about whether the increase will be implemented as planned or postponed further. With Parliament set to resume soon, there is still no guarantee that clarity will come swiftly. Given the upcoming federal elections and potential shifts in government policy, it is possible that there will be no definitive answer for several months. In this evolving landscape, taxpayers must stay proactive in their planning, assessing potential outcomes and considering various strategies to mitigate risks and optimize their tax positions.

Recent CRA announcements and compliance updates for 2024 tax returns

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has recently provided clarifications and relief measures for taxpayers and tax preparers dealing with the ongoing uncertainty surrounding capital gains and other compliance requirements:

Reporting capital gains (losses) on returns

The CRA is maintaining Period 1 (pre-June 25, 2024) and Period 2 (on or after June 25, 2024) reporting on T1 and T3 schedules to align with tax slips already issued or filed, despite reverting to the current CGIR of 1/2.

The updated Schedule 3 for 2024 T1 tax returns maintains a breakdown of dispositions into pre- and post-June 25, 2024, periods to align with tax slip disclosures. Therefore, while issuing the tax slips, the taxpayers must still bifurcate the capital gains into both periods and hence, must be reported accordingly on the T1 and T3 income tax returns. This bifurcation is important from a lifetime capital gains exemption (LCGE) perspective, as only dispositions on or after June 25, 2024, are eligible for the enhanced LCGE of $1,250,000 (up from $1,016,836).

Furthermore, the CRA clarified that taxpayers should not use lines 12701 and 25999, even though they remain on the return, as the 1/2 CGIR applies for all of 2024.

Reporting employee stock options deductions

To mirror the increased CGIR, the government also proposed reducing the employee stock options plan (ESOP) deduction from 1/2 to 1/3. However, with the deferral in the implementation of increased CGIR, the CRA clarified that if the taxpayer’s T4 slip includes amounts in boxes 91 and 92 for ESOP deductions after June 24, 2024, at a 1/3 rate, they will need to enter the amounts from the T4 slip on line 24900 of the T1 return. In addition, taxpayers must claim the additional ESOP deduction on line 24901 in order to claim a total deduction of up to 1/2 of the ESOP benefits received in the year. Taxpayers can use the Federal Worksheet to calculate the additional ESOP deduction.

Capital gains penalty and interest relief

The CRA has clarified that late-filing penalties and arrears interest will be waived until June 2, 2025, for impacted T1 individual filers and until May 1, 2025, for impacted T3 trust filers. In addition, the CRA also clarified that this relief applies to both the filing of T3 slips and the T3 income tax return.

Importantly, however, the CRA has revoked relief for corporations with a filing due date on or before March 3, 2025, that was previously announced. The current CRA website for corporate income tax returns no longer mentions corporations being eligible for the relief when compared to an archived version of the website from January 31, 2025.

Relief on filing information returns

The CRA announced that late-filing penalties for information returns (due February 28, 2025) will be waived if filed by March 7, 2025. For T4PS and T5008 slips, the relief has been extended to March 17, 2025, to allow taxpayers additional time to recalculate the amounts due to the deferred implementation of increased CGIR. However, Revenue Quebec has not announced any such relief yet.

In addition, CRA clarified that in case an information return is filed after the extended due date, it will incur a late filing penalty based on its original due date and not the extended due date. Therefore, taxpayers should make all efforts to ensure the information return is filed by the extended due date.

Planning opportunities amid uncertainty

Given the uncertainty surrounding the CGIR, taxpayers who defer planning in anticipation of a final conclusion may find themselves in a disadvantageous position. If the government ultimately moves forward with the proposed increase, those who did not act proactively may face higher tax liabilities than if they had engaged in early planning. Therefore, taxpayers should assess their financial situations and engage in proactive tax planning to optimize their tax positions. Some key considerations are listed below:

Realization of capital gains

The deferral provides additional time for taxpayers to reconsider their tax planning strategies. Taxpayers can use this period to review their investment portfolio to identify any assets with significant unrealized capital gain and decide whether it makes sense to realize gains before the new rate takes effect on January 1, 2026. This could help taxpayers to take advantage of the current lower CGIR. However, this strategy should be weighed against individual circumstances, market conditions and potential future legislative changes.

Utilizing the exemptions

While the implementation of increased CGIR has been deferred, various exemptions such as the principal residence exemption (PRE), the enhanced LCGE and the Canadian entrepreneurs’ incentive (CEI) are intact. Therefore, the taxpayers can access these exemptions to mitigate the taxes. The proposed increase in the LCGE to $1.25 million for qualified small business corporation shares and farming and fishing property provides a valuable tax planning opportunity.  On the other hand, the newly introduced CEI lowers the inclusion rate for certain business owners selling their businesses. Individuals considering the sale of eligible assets should evaluate whether they can take advantage of these exemptions before any further tax policy shifts occur.

Income-splitting

Taxpayers can explore income-splitting strategies with family members in lower tax brackets to distribute capital gains more tax-efficiently. This may involve gifting or selling assets to family members. However, taxpayers need to stay mindful of attribution rules, tax on split income rules and other negative tax considerations that may arise.

Structuring and deferring gains

Taxpayers who are reluctant to realize gains may explore structuring options to defer capital gains or spread them over multiple years. Techniques such as estate freezes, the use of trusts, and corporate reorganizations may help mitigate the tax impact of a future CGIR increase.

Reviewing and adjusting investment strategies

Investors should re-evaluate their portfolios in light of the proposed changes and consider tax-efficient investment options in tax-sheltered accounts such as tax-free savings accounts (TFSAs) and registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs), to minimize taxable gains. Taxpayers must also diversify their investment portfolios to spread risk and potentially reduce the impact of higher CGIR.

Revisiting estate plans

The proposed increase to the CGIR will lead to higher taxes on death arising due to the deemed disposition of assets at fair market value (FMV). Hence, individuals should revisit existing estate plans in light of the higher CGIR to account for the increased tax liability upon death. In addition, taxpayers who have implemented an estate freeze should re-evaluate its effectiveness.

Transfer of assets to individuals

The draft rules provided safe harbour provisions for individuals to protect capital gains below the annual threshold of $250,000 from the higher CGIR. Corporations holding assets (e.g., marketable securities, real estate and/or shares) may consider transferring such assets to their shareholders to crystallize accrued capital gains before the proposed effective date. By doing so, shareholders would be able to shelter future capital gains of up to $250,000 when they eventually sell the assets.

Section 85 rollovers

Taxpayers can crystallize existing accrued capital gains by electing a rollover under section 85 of the Income Tax Act, thereby potentially benefiting from the lower CGIR.

Generally, under subsection 85(1) rollovers, a taxpayer can transfer eligible property to a taxable Canadian corporation where an election is filed. The taxpayer has the option to elect an amount to be deemed as proceeds of disposition for each transferred property. This elected amount may equal or exceed the adjusted cost base (ACB) or undepreciated capital cost (UCC) of the property but must not exceed its FMV.

Since this election is due when the earliest tax return for that particular year is due, taxpayers could elect at the property’s maximum FMV to crystallize the capital gains at a lower rate if the legislation proceeds as planned. Alternatively, taxpayers have the option to elect the transfer to occur at the ACB/UCC of the property, facilitating a fully tax-deferred transfer without triggering capital gains at the time of transfer. This strategy provides the ability and time to the taxpayer to elect a partial or no capital gain depending on where the legislation ends up.

Deferring capital losses carryforward

As the value of net capital losses from previous years will be adjusted to align with the applicable inclusion rate, taxpayers can consider deferring the capital losses carried forward because they will be more valuable when used against the capital gains realized at a higher rate.

Looking ahead: What to expect?

As Parliament resumes and the political landscape unfolds, taxpayers should closely monitor developments. The federal election will play a crucial role in determining the fate of the proposed CGIR increase. A change in government could lead to amendments, delays or even the complete withdrawal of the proposal. Furthermore, global economic conditions, including tariffs, trade tensions, inflation rates, and economic growth in major economies, can influence Canada’s economic stability and policy decisions. Therefore, predicting the final form of the CGIR becomes complex.

Regardless of the outcome, taxpayers must remain adaptable. Waiting until the last minute to make critical tax decisions could result in lost opportunities or higher tax liabilities. The road ahead remains uncertain, but taxpayers can turn ambiguity into opportunity with the right planning.


This article was written by Daniel Mahne, Chetna Thapar and originally appeared on 2025-02-26. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2025/navigating-capital-gains-compliance-updates-tax-planning-strategies.html

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

GST/HST Tax Holiday: Rebate Applications

For the December 14, 2024, to February 15, 2025, period, certain items normally subject to GST/HST should not have GST/HST applied at the point of sale. Businesses selling these goods can still claim input tax credits for the GST/HST they paid on inputs acquired to supply the good, as they are zero-rated.

The types of items covered by this temporary measure include (but are not limited to):

  • children’s clothing, footwear, diapers, and car seats;
  • select children’s toys, jigsaw puzzles, and video games/devices;
  • printed newspapers and books;
  • Christmas and similar decorative trees; and
  • various foods and drinks (including some alcoholic drinks), including but not limited to those provided at establishments like restaurants.

If GST/HST is mistakenly charged on the purchase of one of these goods, the purchaser can request a refund directly from the supplier.

If the supplier does not provide a refund or is no longer in business, the purchaser can apply to CRA for a GST/HST rebate (minimum claim is $2) using Form GST189: Rebate under reason code 1C, “Amounts paid in error.” The application must be filed within two years after the date the amount was paid in error. CRA has suggested that a purchaser consolidate all their claims (including associated receipts) and submit a single rebate application after the GST/HST break period is over.

Ensure to keep receipts for purchases where GST/HST was charged improperly. Multiple claims can be included in a single rebate submission.

Trump’s Steel and Aluminum Tariffs Turn Uncertainty Into Concern for Canada

It took less than a week for the uneasy pause in trade tensions between Canada and the U.S. to reignite after U.S. President Donald Trump announced steep tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

The 25% tariff, which is set to take effect on March 12, includes products from Canada — the largest source of U.S. steel and aluminum imports.

Although the tariffs apply to imports from all countries, Canada will be the most impacted by far as the U.S. imports a larger amount of steel and aluminum from Canada than any other country. Of note, aluminum imports from Canada are greater than the next 10 countries combined.

The tariff announcement also overrides current trade agreements the U.S. has with Canada, Mexico, the UK, Japan, and others.

As Canada considers its response, these tariffs — combined with the currently paused executive order targetting a broad range of Canadian goods — would severely impact Canada’s manufacturing sector.

This isn’t the first time Trump has levied tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. During his first administration in 2018 amid free-trade negotiations, U.S. tariffs on Canadian products — as well as Canada’s reciprocal tariffs — were in place for just over a year.

The economic hit appears confined within the manufacturing sector thus far. The loonie stayed steady, and if there are exemptions like in 2018 – which remains unclear at this moment – then the overall hit on Canada’s growth and inflation would be limited. U.S. steel imports by country

U.S. aluminum imports by country

Manufacturing sector vulnerable

Manufacturing is the sector most vulnerable to tariffs due to the deep integration of the Canada-U.S.-Mexico supply chain. A significant 39.4% (641,000 jobs) of Canadian manufacturing jobs (641,000) rely on U.S. demand.

Canada’s 90,000 manufacturers contribute nearly 10% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP), generate 1.9 million jobs, contribute to one-quarter of Canada’s business research and development spending and account for 60% of Canada’s exports according to the Canadian Association of Manufacturers and Exporters.

Canada’s manufacturing sector has faced multiple challenges and economic pressures in recent years, including the pandemic shock, supply chain disruptions, labour shortages, rising costs, and rising financing costs. The sector gradually began to recover as interest rates started to drop and the labour market stabilized. The manufacturing purchasing managers’ index (PMI) even signalled a return to growth at the end of 2024 after a prolonged period of contraction.

The Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) signalled a return to growth at the end of 2024 after a prolonged period of contraction.

The disruption from Trump’s latest order would stall the progress made by the overall manufacturing sector and disproportionately affect Canada’s base metals production and processing industry.

Despite trade policy uncertainty, Canada’s manufacturing sector added a staggering 33,100 out of 76,000 total jobs gained in January. This surge, the largest since the pandemic-related wide swings in 2020, signals underlying optimism and is notable due to the struggles of goods-producing sectors in the last five years.

The takeaway

The only certainty with current U.S.-Canada tariff tensions remains uncertainty, so business leaders should keep a careful eye on the latest developments and act judiciously.

Ahead of the expected March 12 implementation, manufacturers could consider taking these proactive steps:

  • Understanding your supply chains and sourcing practices, identifying country-specific risks and vendor concentration vulnerabilities, assessing full landed cost of imported goods including tariffs. Explore alternative sourcing strategies and evaluate associated costs.
  • Assessing tariff planning strategies, including advancing deliveries ahead of the anticipated tariffs, utilizing bonded warehouses, foreign trade zones, and duty drawbacks programs.
  • Exploring expansion into new global markets, diversifying revenue streams, and distribution channels.
  • Modelling pricing strategies to determine the feasibility of passing additional costs to customers, as well as negotiating long-term contracts and cost-sharing arrangements with vendors.
  • Evaluating long-term shifts in supply chains, production and distribution footprint to be prepared for rapid changes, tariff increases, and other trade risks.
  • Optimizing operations by identifying opportunities for increased efficiency, cost reduction, raising workforce productivity, enhancing profitability throughout the value chain, and prioritizing investments that generate long-term values and deliver high returns on capital outlays.

This article was written by Irina Im, Tu Nguyen and originally appeared on 2025-02-11. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://realeconomy.rsmus.com/trump-steel-aluminum-tariffs-canada

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

Even with Pause, Trump’s Tariffs and Canada’s Response Establish Volatile New Economic Reality

After a weekend that saw U.S. President Donald Trump impose steep tariffs on Canadian goods and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau put forward retaliatory measures, the widely feared tariff war appears on hold after meetings between the two leaders on Monday.

Instead of taking effect Tuesday, implementation of tariffs will be paused by 30 days after Canada made additional commitments to invest in border security.

While businesses and consumers may welcome this reprieve, the back-and-forth between the longtime trading partners laid bare Canada’s economic vulnerability amid ongoing political volatility.

The U.S. tariffs set to take effect in 30 days include an additional 25% tariff on nearly all Canadian goods—with a 10% tariff on energy products.

In response, Canada’s retaliatory measures included a 25% tariff on $155 billion worth of goods from the U.S. The first phase would include tariffs on $30 billion in U.S. goods; the second phase would take effect 21 days after.

The U.S. also introduced a 10% tariff on all products from China. While Trump initially announced a 25% tariff on all goods from Mexico, its implementation was delayed for a month after meeting with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.

Canada, Mexico, and China comprise more than 40% of all U.S. imports.

If the tariffs take effect after the pause, they will affect all countries involved—including pushing Canada into a recession, adding inflationary pressures, and leading to job losses. This comes after Canada managed to lower inflation to the Bank of Canada’s target last year without tipping the economy into a recession.

Despite the intercession, Canada should consider re-evaluating its trade relationships. Strategies that could address this include expanding and strengthening trade relations with other countries and removing interprovincial trade barriers to allow more seamless domestic trade.

Although there will be increased costs in the short-to-medium term, diversification to de-risk is a lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic that can prove useful now.

This chart shows U.S. imports by country

Dire economic impacts

U.S. tariffs and Canada’s retaliation would lead to a 2% reduction in the Canadian economy, down from a projected growth rate of 1.8% this year.

The measures by both sides could also lift inflation from the current 2% to a 2.7% headline number as Canadian consumers end up bearing some of the increased costs from tariffs.

The depreciation of the Canadian dollar could mitigate the prices of exports for U.S. importers, but this exacerbates the pain for Canadian businesses and consumers.

Industries that are highly integrated across borders, including auto manufacturing and even agriculture, could come to a standstill rapidly if tariffs are implemented.

Job losses should be expected across Canadian industries, from manufacturing to tourism to transportation. Higher prices decrease demand, which means aggregate demand for goods across the U.S. and Canada would drop, leading to fewer jobs.

For Canadian households, this means an increase in prices of multiple consumer goods like groceries, appliances, and especially vehicles.

Prices of perishable goods such as fruits and vegetables are likely to jump quickly if tariffs are enacted, given that they cannot be stockpiled in advance.

Although the price of goods like appliances and cars would take longer to increase, they will inevitably rise if tariffs take effect.

Despite the pause, Canada should consider re-evaluating its trade relationships

In addition to higher prices, expect a smaller selection of available goods should tariffs come into force—especially fewer U.S.-made products in stores.

Businesses that are the most vulnerable to tariffs are those that frequently import and export their goods and are part of a highly integrated supply chain. This burden will be acutely felt in situations where it’s possible that goods will be subject to tariffs each time they cross the border.

Companies that produce goods in one country and sell in another, such as Canadian manufacturers that sell to U.S. consumers, would also take a hit.

Other businesses likely to be strained by tariffs are those with tight margins and without healthy cash reserves. They may be forced to pass on the costs to consumers and might run into cash-flow issues since they must pay the tariffs upfront and might not receive payments until much later.

Canada’s response

Should the U.S. follow through on tariffs after 30 days, Canada’s response would be much more targeted. Its two-wave approach allows businesses to stock up in advance, mitigating the impact on Canadian businesses.

Goods targeted in the first round include orange juice, peanut butter, alcohol, and apparel, which are not top imports from the U.S. into Canada.

Canada has close substitutes produced domestically and also imports products like apparel from countries such as China or Vietnam. This strategy could help mitigate the immediate hit to consumers’ wallets as many are likely to switch to non-U.S. substitutes.

But Canada’s later wave of tariffs includes top imports from the U.S. like passenger vehicles, aerospace products, trucks, and buses. In addition to significant supply chain disruptions, consumers can expect to see auto prices go up substantially.

This chart shows Canada's top imports from the U.S. by product

Before the pause was announced, individual provinces implemented non-tariff responses to the U.S. measures.

Alcohol is one product where there are plenty of domestic options and non-U.S. import substitutes, meaning Canada’s decision is designed to hurt U.S. producers without causing too much pain to local consumers.

Additional insights

The Canadian dollar is expected to slide further to mitigate the impact of tariffs on Canadian exports to the U.S. in the event tariffs take effect. Previously, tariff threats pushed the loonie from 0.72 US before the election to 0.69 US—a level not seen since the early days of the pandemic.

While the depreciation of the Canadian dollar would make imports more expensive for Canadians, the net effect on inflation is far from one-to-one. The economic blow from tariffs would decrease aggregate demand, keeping prices from rising too much.

In the short-to-medium run, most of the increase in prices would be borne by consumers, not exporters.

This chart shows Canadian exports by country

The impact of tariffs extends beyond traded goods between Canada and the U.S. The unemployment rate would spike as jobs are lost, which lowers demand for all goods and services like new cars, dining out, and entertainment. Restaurants, hotels, and other services in border towns will be particularly hard hit.

The effect on each industry and each good depends on whether there are close Canadian substitutes to U.S. imports and how well supply chains can work around tariffs. For example, tariffs and retaliation would devastate auto companies in Canada, the U.S., and Mexico and leave them unable to compete with businesses in Asia or Europe.

The takeaway

Trudeau and Trump may have agreed to a pause, but the threat of a puzzling, lose-lose trade war launched by the Trump administration remains a serious concern.

If U.S. tariffs do take effect and Canada responds in kind, the disruption will slash billions of dollars from Canada’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) this year and can hurt businesses and households in Canada, Mexico, and the U.S.

If tariffs turn out to be long-lasting, they will present another complete disruption to the Canadian economy and supply chains—a second in five years following the pandemic.

The scenario in which economic damage is minimized is one in which a trade agreement is negotiated, putting an end to tariffs. The longer tariffs and retaliation continue, the more fractured and uncompetitive the three countries’ economies become—and the more economic pain consumers would feel from higher prices, fewer goods available and fewer jobs.


This article was written by Tu Nguyen and originally appeared on 2025-02-03. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://realeconomy.rsmus.com/trump-tariffs-canada-response

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

Canada Delays Capital Gains Tax Increase to 2026

Executive summary

Canadian taxpayers who have already filed returns based on the proposed increase to the Capital Gains Inclusion Rate (CGIR) should be able to amend their returns after the federal government delayed the increase until 2026. The ongoing political uncertainty in the country means Canadians considering dispositions of capital property in 2026 and beyond should account for the possibility of no increase.

 

The federal government delayed its proposed increase to the Capital Gains Inclusion Rate (CGIR) to on or after Jan. 1, 2026, after initially applying to dispositions occurring on or after June 25, 2024.

The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) has announced that:

  • It will grant relief from late-filing penalties and interest to impacted individuals and trusts who file by June 2, 2025, and May 1, 2025, respectively.
  • Corporations who filed using the increased CGIR will have reassessments issued to adjust the inclusion rate.

Taxpayers can also request amendments to their assessment. All taxpayers should track capital gains and losses according to the new Jan. 1, 2026, effective date to ease compliance.

The CGIR determines the portion of income from the sale of capital property—including shares, land, buildings, and equipment—that is included in a taxpayer’s income.

Initially proposed in last year’s federal budget, the CGIR was set to rise from 50% to 66.67%. Individuals and some types of trusts would continue to be eligible for the one-half inclusion rate on their first $250,000 of net capital gains in a year.

Related amendments

The increased CGIR was accompanied by several related or consequential amendments, such as an increase in the withholding tax rate for dispositions of taxable Canadian property by non-residents.

While the Department of Finance has not yet clarified how most proposed amendments will be impacted, it did state the increase of the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption from $1,016,836 to $1.25 million will still be effective June 25, 2024, and the Canadian Entrepreneurs’ Incentive will still be introduced as of the 2025 taxation year. Neither of these amendments are currently law.

Political uncertainty complicates increase’s future

Canada’s ongoing political uncertainty in the wake of Trudeau’s resignation left proposed legislation like the increased CGIR unresolved.

A new Liberal leader, who would become prime minister, is expected to be announced on March 9. The future of the increase is not certain under a new Liberal prime minister—and, should an early election be triggered and a new party takes over, a new administration may have its own vision for the CGIR.

In the interim, those considering dispositions of capital property which will occur in 2026 onward should account for the possibility of no increased CGIR.


This article was written by Cassandra Knapman and originally appeared on 2025-01-31. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2025/canada-delays-capital-gains-tax-increase-to-2026.html

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

Navigating the New ESOPs Deduction Under the Revised Capital Gains Regime

Executive summary:

Recent revisions introduced in the Federal Budget 2024, particularly the increase in the capital gains inclusion rate (CGIR) from 50% to 66.67%, have introduced new changes to taxpayers utilizing employee stock option plans (ESOP). These changes impact employees by introducing a new deduction framework under paragraphs 110(1)(d.4) and section 38.01, creating potential for significant tax benefits or, in some cases, tax pitfalls. Detailed scenarios below illustrate how the new rules interact to affect the taxation of ESOPs and capital gains. Despite the increased complexity of the revised framework, taxpayers can take advantage of these changes through proactive and strategic tax planning.

 

Employee stock option plans (ESOPs) are widely regarded as an effective tool for remunerating and incentivizing employees, particularly in fostering long-term alignment with corporate goals. From a tax perspective, ESOPs have historically provided distinct advantages for employees, including the ability to claim deductions on taxable benefits arising from stock option exercises and, in some cases, to defer tax liabilities to a future date.

However, recent changes introduced in the Federal Budget 2024, particularly the increase in the capital gains inclusion rate (CGIR) from 50% to 66.67%, have introduced new complexities and challenges for taxpayers utilizing ESOPs. Of particular concern is the overlap between the deferral of stock option benefits for Canadian-controlled private corporation (CCPC) ESOPs and the realization of capital gains in the same year, which may make it difficult to optimally utilize the $250,000 annual deduction limit, turning what is often seen as a beneficial rule into an unexpected trap. These amendments alter the tax landscape for employees and introduce new considerations for tax planning. For individual taxpayers, the decision to delay certain dispositions or exercises can create possible tax savings or, in some cases, tax pitfalls.

It is important to note, however, that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation, pending selection of a new Liberal Party leader, and requested that Parliament be prorogued until March 24. As a result, it is possible that the proposed amendments discussed below may not be passed.

Taxation of ESOPs: Existing rules and new regime

Under the current rules, when an employee exercises a stock option, the difference between the stock’s Fair Market Value (FMV) and its exercise price (stock option benefit) is included in the employee’s income as a taxable benefit. For employees of CCPCs, taxation of the stock option benefit is deferred until the shares are ultimately disposed of or exchanged. This deferral provides an advantage by allowing employees to delay the income recognition and the associated tax liability.

Historically, the taxation of ESOPs in Canada mirrored the taxation of capital gains, with employees being eligible to claim a stock option deduction equal to 50% of the stock option benefit. This effectively reduced the net income inclusion of the stock option benefit to 50%.

Changes effective June 25, 2024

Effective June 25, 2024, the CGIR has increased from 50% to 66.67%. Additionally, the stock option benefit deduction under paragraphs 110(1)(d) to (d.3) has been reduced from 50% of the taxable benefit to 33.33%, aligning the net stock option benefit with the new CGIR. Individual taxpayers will be able to maintain the 50% CGIR on their first $250,000 of capital gains annually, which must be shared with any stock option benefits for the year. This provision provides an avenue for individual taxpayers to manage their taxable income more efficiently while still adhering to the revised rules.

Introduction of paragraph 110(1)(d.4)

To accommodate the $250,000 annual limit, paragraph 110(1)(d.4) has been proposed. This provision enables an additional deduction equal to 1/6th of the stock option benefit up to $250,000, provided a deduction is claimed under any of paragraphs 110(1)(d) to (d.3). In effect, this allows taxpayers to claim a cumulative deduction equal to 50% on the first $250,000 of stock option benefit (33.33% under paragraphs 110(1)(d), (d.1), (d.2) or (d.3) and 1/6th under paragraph 110(1)(d.4)). Additionally, new section 38.01 has been introduced, allowing for a deduction of 1/6th of the capital gain for the first $250,000 capital gains annually. However, this deduction is ground down by six times the deduction taken under paragraph 110(1)(d.4). These new paragraphs collectively ensure that taxpayers can achieve a reduced CGIR of 50% for the first $250,000 of combined stock option benefits and capital gains.

Example

The following example models how these deductions interact.

A taxpayer has an ESOP with a public corporation that was issued out-of-the-money for 50,000 shares. The taxpayer has $200,000 of other capital gains realized on the disposition of marketable securities. Consider the following three scenarios (all exercises occur on or after June 25, 2024):

  • Scenario I: The ESOP has an exercise price of $10. The taxpayer exercised the option while the FMV of the shares was $20. At the time of sale, the FMV of the shares was $25.
  • Scenario II: The ESOP has an exercise price of $10. The taxpayer exercised the option while the FMV of the shares was $12. At the time of sale, the FMV of the shares was $18.
  • Scenario III: The ESOP has an exercise price of $10. The taxpayer exercised the option while the FMV of the shares was $10.50. At the time of sale, the FMV of the shares was $11.

Particulars

 

Scenario I

Scenario II

Scenario III

Calculation of employment benefit
FMV on exercise (A) $ 20.00 $ 12.00 $ 10.50
Option price (B) $ 10.00 $ 10.00 $ 10.00
Stock option benefit per share (C) = (A) – (B) $ 10.00 $ 2.00 $ 0.50
No. of shares (D) 50,000 50,000 50,000
Total option benefit (E) = (C) x (D) $ 500,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 25,000.00
Stock option deduction under 110(1)(d)(1) (F) = (E) x 1/3 $ 166,666.67 $ 33,333.33 $ 8,333.33
Taxable employment benefit (G) = (E) – (F) $ 333,333.33 $ 66,666.67 $ 16,666.67
 
Calculation of taxable capital gains
Proceeds of Disposition (H) $ 25.00 $ 18.00 $ 11.00
FMV on exercise (I) $ 20.00 $ 12.00 $ 10.50
Capital gain per share (J) = (H) – (I) $ 5.00 $ 6.00 $ 0.50
No. of shares (K) 50,000 50,000 50,000
Capital gain on ESOP shares (L) = (J) x (K) $ 250,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 25,000.00
Unrelated capital gains – assumed (M) $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00
Total capital gains (N) = (L) + (M) $ 450,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 225,000.00
Total taxable capital gains (O) = (N) x 2/3 $ 300,000.00 $ 333,333.33 $ 150,000.00
 
Calculation of new 110(1)(d.4) deduction
3 x deduction under 110(1)(d) or (d.1) (P) = (F) x 3 $ 500,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 25,000.00
1.5 x Amount deducted under (d.01) (Q) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Lesser of $250,000 and difference of the above (R) = Lower of 250k & (P) – (Q) $ 250,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 25,000.00
110(1)(d.4) deduction (S) = (R) x 1/6 $ 41,666.67 $ 16,666.67 $ 4,166.67
 
Calculation of CG reduction under 38.01
250,000 – 6 x 110(1)(d.4) deduction (T) = $250,000 – ((S) x 6) $ – $ 150,000.00 $ 225,000.00
1.5 x taxable capital gains (U) = (O) x 1.5 $ 450,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 225,000.00
38.01 deduction – 1/6 times the lesser of the above (V) = 1/6 ( lower of (T) & (U)) $ – $ 25,000.00 $ 37,500.00
 
Total net stock option income inclusion (W) = (G) – (S) $ 291,666.67 $ 50,000.00 $ 12,500.00
Total taxable capital gains (X) = (O) – (V) $ 300,000.00 $ 308,333.33 $ 112,500.00
Implications for CCPC ESOPs

Notably, the stock option benefit deferral for CCPC ESOPs under subsection 7(1.1) can inadvertently create difficulties in optimally utilizing the $250,000 annual limit. Since the deferral delays the income recognition of the stock option benefit to the year the individual disposes of the shares, both the stock option benefit and the associated capital gain are realized in the same year. This overlap necessitates careful planning, as the combined income inclusions may exceed the $250,000 threshold, reducing the effectiveness of the deductions under paragraph 110(1)(d.4) and section 38.01. In contrast, taxpayers holding shares outside a CCPC ESOP may have more flexibility in timing their stock option exercises and capital gains realizations.

Key takeaway

The introduction of a new deduction framework for ESOPs under the revised capital gains regime reflects an effort to balance the increased CGIR with targeted relief for individual taxpayers. While the changes introduce new complexities, they also present opportunities for strategic tax planning, particularly for taxpayers able to optimize their use of the $250,000 annual limit.

By understanding the nuances of paragraphs 110(1)(d.4) and section 38.01, and leveraging these provisions effectively, taxpayers can navigate the revised rules while minimizing their overall tax liability. As the tax landscape continues to evolve, proactive planning and adherence to best practices will be key to ensuring compliance and maximizing benefits under the new regime.


This article was written by Chetna Thapar, Daniel Mahne and originally appeared on 2025-01-21. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2025/navigating-the-new-esops-deduction-under-the-revised-capital-gains-regime.html

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

2025 Tax Filing and Payment Dates for Canadian Middle-Market Taxpayers

Executive summary

Simplify your tax filing process with the compiled key deadlines for middle-market taxpayers. This article is your solution for tracking important tax dates. Timely filing and payment can help you avoid delays in refunds, benefits, or credits, and can prevent late filing or payment penalties and interest.

 

With the approaching tax season, a taxpayer may have to file numerous returns and forms to ensure tax compliance. In addition, keeping track of the annual tax filing and payment deadlines is increasingly difficult with the changing tax and political landscape. This article summarizes the key tax filing and payment deadlines for 2025 for middle-market taxpayers.

Where the taxpayer omits filing and payment, late files and remits, additional penalties and/or interest may start to accrue, adding an additional cost burden on the taxpayer.

Return/ Form Type

Taxpayer Type

Due date of filing or payment

T1 Returns Self-employed individuals or those whose spouses or common-law partners are self-employed
  • Return due on June 15, 2025*
  • Tax owing due on April 30, 2025
Other individuals
  • Return due on April 30, 2025
  • Tax owing due on April 30, 2025
Deceased individuals where the date of death is before November 1, 2024
  • Return due on:
    • For self-employed individuals: June 15, 2025*
    • For others: April 30, 2025
  • Tax owing due on April 30, 2025
Deceased individuals where the date of death is on or after November 1, 2024
  • Return due six months after the date of death
  • Tax owing due six months after the date of death
Non-resident individuals with a Canadian filing obligation (Section 216/217 returns)
  • Return due on June 30, 2025
  • Tax owing in excess of withheld amounts due on April 30, 2025
T2 Corporate Tax returns For corporations having a December 31, 2024, calendar year-end
  • Return due on June 30, 2025
  • Tax owing due:
    • For CCPCs claiming Small business deduction (SBD) with taxable income (including all associated corporations) less than the small business limit: 3 months after year-end
    • For all other corporations: 2 months after year-end
For corporations having a non-calendar year-end
  • Return due no later than six months after the end of the corporation’s taxation year
  • Tax owing due:
    • For CCPCs claiming SBD with taxable income (including all associated corporations) less than the small business limit: 3 months after year-end
    • For other corporations: 2 months after year-end
T3 Trust returns Inter-vivos trusts (required to have a calendar year-end) Return due 90 days after the trust’s year-end on March 31, 2025
Testamentary trusts and Non-resident trusts with a filing obligation in Canada (not required to have a calendar year-end) Return due no later than 90 days after the trust’s year-end date
T4, T4A-NR, T5 Due on Feb 28, 2025
NR4 Non-Resident information returns For an estate or trust Return due 90 days after the trust’s year-end on March 31, 2025
Other taxpayers Return due on March 31, 2025
T5013 Partnership returns
  • Where partners are either individuals, trusts, professional corporations or a combination thereof; and
  • Partnerships that are tax shelters
Return due on March 31, 2025
Where partners are corporate partners (not including professional corporations) Return due five months after the end of the taxation year of the partnership
All other cases Earlier of:
  • March 31 after the calendar year in which the fiscal period of the partnership ended;
  • The day that is five months after the end of the partnership’s fiscal period
T1134 Information return relating to foreign affiliates For individuals and other taxpayers having December 31, 2024 as year-end Return due on October 31, 2025
For other taxpayers with a taxation year beginning in 2024 Return due no later than 10 months after the year-end
T1135 Foreign income verification statement Self-employed individuals or those whose spouses or common-law partners are self-employed Return due on June 15, 2025*
Other individuals Return due on April 30, 2025
For corporations having a December 31, 2024 calendar year-end Return due on June 30, 2025
For corporations with a non-calendar year-end Return due no later than six months after the end of the corporation’s taxation year
  • Partnerships where partners are either individuals, trusts, professional corporations, or a combination thereof; and
  • Partnerships that are tax shelters
Return due on March 31, 2025
Partnerships where partners are corporate partners (not including professional corporations) Return due five months after the end of the taxation year of the partnership
All other partnerships Earlier of:
  • March 31 after the calendar year in which the fiscal period of the partnership ended;
  • The day that is five months after the end of the partnership’s fiscal period
Inter-vivos trusts with December 31, 2024 year-end Return due on or before March 31, 2025
Testamentary trusts Return due no later than 90 days after the trust’s year-end date
T106 Information return of non-arm’s length transactions with non-residents Self-employed individuals or those whose spouses or common-law partners are self-employed Return due on June 15, 2025*
Other individuals Return due on April 30, 2025
For corporations having a December 31, 2024, calendar year-end Return due on June 30, 2025
For other corporations Return due no later than six months after the end of the corporation’s taxation year
  • Partnerships where partners are either individuals, trusts, professional corporations or a combination thereof; and
  • Partnerships that are tax shelters
Return due on March 31, 2025
Partnerships where partners are corporate partners (not including professional corporations) Return due five months after the end of the taxation year of the partnership
All other partnerships Earlier of:
  • March 31 after the calendar year in which the fiscal period of the partnership ended;
  • The day that is five months after the end of the partnership’s fiscal period
Inter-vivos trusts with December 31, 2024, year-end Return due on or before March 31, 2025
Testamentary trusts and Non-resident trusts with a filing obligation in Canada Return due no later than 90 days after the trust’s year-end date
UHT-2900 Underused Housing Tax Return and Election form Certain taxpayers owning a residential property in Canada
  • Return for 2024 calendar year due on April 30, 2025
  • Tax owing due on April 30, 2025
Form T661 Scientific research and experimental development (SR&ED) Self-employed individuals Form due no later than 12 months after the filing due date of T1
Corporations (except for non-profit SR&ED corporations) Form due no later than 12 months after the filing due date of T2 or 18 months from the end of the taxation year
Non-profit SR&ED corporations Form due no later than six months after the end of the corporation’s taxation year
Partnerships Form due no later than 12 months after the earliest of all filing due dates for each member’s income tax return deadline for the tax year in which the partnership’s fiscal period ends.
Trusts Form due no later than 12 months after the filing due date of T3
RC312 Reportable Transaction and Notifiable Transaction Information return Every person or entity for whom a tax benefit results from the reportable transactions or the person who enters into the reportable transaction on behalf of that person Information return due 90 days from the earlier of:
  • When the transaction is entered into;
  • When the person is contractually obligated to enter the transaction
RC313 Reportable uncertain tax treatment (RUTT) Information return For corporations having December 31, 2024, year-end that are required to disclose RUTT Information return due no later than June 30, 2025
For corporations with a non-calendar year-end that are required to disclose RUTT Information return due no later than six months after the end of the taxation year
Schedule 130 (or information to be contained therein) for entities having interest and financing expenses or interest and financing revenues under EIFEL For corporations having December 31, 2024, year-end Information return due on June 30, 2025
For corporations with non-calendar year-end Information return due within 6 months after the end of the corporation’s taxation year
Trusts Information return due within 90 days after the trust’s tax year-end.
Partnerships where partners are either trusts, professional corporations or a combination thereof including tax-shelter partnerships Information return due on March 31, 2025
Partnerships where partners are corporate partners (not including professional corporations) Information return due five months after the after the end of the partnership’s fiscal period
All other partnerships Earlier of:
  • March 31 after the calendar year in which the fiscal period of the partnership ended;
  • The day that is five months after the end of the partnership’s fiscal period
Digital Services Tax Foreign or domestic businesses that meet the filing requirement for any one of the 2022, 2023, or 2024 calendar years Return due on June 30, 2025
GloBE Information return (GIR) for Global Minimum Tax (GMT) If the Ultimate parent entity (UPE) or designated filing entity files GIR outside Canada and that jurisdiction has a qualifying competent authority agreement with Canada Return is not required to be filed in Canada. Each Canadian entity of the multinational enterprise (MNE) group must notify the CRA of the identity and jurisdiction of the filing entity.
If the UPE or designated entity is located in Canada or there is no qualifying competent authority agreement with the relevant foreign jurisdiction
  • If it is the first year in which the MNE group is subject to GMT: Return must be filed within 18 months from the end of the taxation year
  • For other years: Return must be filed within 15 months from the end of the taxation year

* As per the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) guidance, when a due date falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or public holiday recognized by the CRA, the return is considered filed and the payment is considered to be made on time if the CRA receives the filing, or if the payment or filing is postmarked, on or before the next business day. Therefore, in these instances, as the due date falls on a weekend or a federal holiday, the filing or payment deadline is the first working day following.


This article was written by Chetna Thapar, Farryn Cohn and originally appeared on 2025-01-21. Reprinted with permission from RSM Canada LLP.
© 2024 RSM Canada LLP. All rights reserved. https://rsmcanada.com/insights/tax-alerts/2025/2025-tax-filing-payment-dates-canadian-middle-market-taxpayers.html

RSM Canada LLP is a limited liability partnership that provides public accounting services and is the Canadian member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent assurance, tax and consulting firms. RSM Canada Consulting LP is a limited partnership that provides consulting services and is an affiliate of RSM US LLP, a member firm of RSM International. The member firms of RSM International collaborate to provide services to global clients but are separate and distinct legal entities that cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. Visit rsmcanada.com/about for more information regarding RSM Canada and RSM International.

The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM Canada LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM Canada LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.

Shareholder Purchasing Asset: Input Tax Credit (ITC)

An August 20, 2024, Tax Court of Canada case reviewed whether a corporation could claim ITCs of $8,874 related to the purchase of two vehicles that were used by the corporation. One vehicle was purchased by the shareholder and the other was purchased by the shareholder and his spouse.

Taxpayer loses

To be eligible for an ITC, the corporation must meet all of the following conditions:

  1. the corporation must have acquired the vehicles;
  2. the GST/HST in respect of the vehicles must be payable or must have been paid by the corporation; and
  3. the vehicles must have been acquired in the course of the corporation’s commercial activities.

The Court found no evidence that the corporation acquired either vehicle; the corporation’s name was not on the sales agreements, bill of sales, vehicle registrations, or proof of insurance. In addition, there was no evidence of any trust, agency or assignment agreement. As such, criterion (a) was not met.

The Court also found that the corporation was not liable to pay consideration under the purchase agreement for either vehicle; therefore, GST/HST was not payable by the corporation. As such, criterion (b) was not met.

While the corporation argued that the vehicles were used or available for use by the corporation, the vehicles were not actually acquired in the course of the corporation’s commercial activities. As such, criterion (c) was not met.

While only failing one of the above criteria would be fatal to the claim, the corporation failed all three. The ITC was appropriately denied.

Care should be afforded to acquire assets in the proper entity such that GST/HST can be recovered as an input tax credit, if appropriate.

Trust Distributions: Violating Trust Terms

A March 30, 2023, Tax Court of Canada case reiterated the importance of the trustee of a trust properly understanding the terms of the trust. In this case, the trust had paid $100,000 to two beneficiaries, both under age 18, from capital gains eligible for the capital gains exemption. However, the terms of the trust prohibited payments to beneficiaries under age 18.

Taxpayer loses

The Court ruled that amounts paid in violation of the trust terms were not payable for income tax purposes and were therefore neither income to the beneficiaries nor deductible from the trust’s income

If acting as a trustee of a trust, ensure to fully understand the terms of the trust to avoid a surprising tax consequence.